| “无废城市”固体废物综合处理产业园建设水平评价指标体系 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵曦,吴姗姗,陆克定.“无废城市”固体废物综合处理产业园建设水平评价指标体系[J].环境工程,2021,39(2):136. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵曦 吴姗姗 陆克定 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 深圳市汉宇环境科技有限公司, 广东 深圳 518001; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目（41375124）；深圳市生态环境局环境科研专项基金项目。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 综合采用德尔菲法（Delphi）、层次分析法（AHP）和五分制综合评分法建立了1套适用于评价"无废城市"固体废物综合处理产业园建设水平的指标体系。从选址、功能、工艺、污染控制、管理等的角度，制定了25个评价指标，并将其归纳为选址与园内布局、处理处置功能与容量、工艺路线、污染控制技术、环境管理机制和邻利共融措施6个准则层指标群，通过计算权重和对评价指标的赋分，实现对固体废物综合处理产业园建设水平的量化评价。通过对华南某市现有案例的应用案例分析，4座固体废物综合处理产业园的建设水平分值分别为3.36、2.12、2.10、1.82，分别处于良好、中等、中等和一般的水平。
|
| 关 键 词： | 无废城市 固体废物综合处理产业园 评价指标体系 层次分析法 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-06-23 |
DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING CONSTRUCTION LEVEL IN OPERATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT PARK FOR ZERO-WASTE CITIES |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Shenzhen Hanyu Environmental Science & Technology Co. Ltd, Shenzhen 518001, China;2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China |
| |
| Abstract: | To develop an assessment system for evaluating the construction level of municipal solid waste comprehensive treatment parks (MSWCTPs) in zero-waste cities, specific indicators were determined by Delphi method, and the weight of each indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the evaluation index was quantified by five-point score system. This assessment system integrated three modules, i.e., the target, the criterion and the index. From the perspective of site selection, function, process, pollution control, management, etc., 25 evaluation criterias were identified and summarized into six groups, including site selection and layout of the park, treatment and disposal capacity, process route, pollution control technology, environmental management mechanism and measures for neighbor benefit harmony. The evaluation index was quantified and the weight of each index was assigned to assess the construction level of MSWCTPs. This system was then applied to four MSWCTPs in South China. The construction level scores of the four MSWCTPs were 3.36 (good), 2.12 (fair), 2.10 (fair), and 1.82 (poor), respectively. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《环境工程》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《环境工程》下载全文 |
|
