| 化工过程定量风险评价进展及风险准则比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 魏利军,,王如君,,多英全,,胡馨升.化工过程定量风险评价进展及风险准则比较分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(8):12-17. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 魏利军 王如君 多英全 胡馨升 |
| |
| 作者单位： | （1.中国安全生产科学研究院，北京 100012；2. 重大危险源监控与事故应急技术国家安全监管总局安全生产重点实验室，北京 100012；3. 中国矿业大学（北京） 资源与安全工程学院，北京 100083) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了研究化工过程定量风险评价进展以及对风险准则进行比较分析，通过梳理定量风险评价的发展历程，从方法来源、法律法规进展以及软件技术发展3个方面，逐一分析各国的发展情况，并结合英国、荷兰、美国与中国个人和社会可接受风险准则的比较结果，分析各国风险准则的异同。此外，阐述了德国和日本化工过程安全控制的准则内容。结果表明:我国定量风险评价技术起步相对较晚，但实施导则、风险准则的制定以及评价软件的开发，标志着我国定量风险评价方法理论体系的发展较为完备。
|
| 关 键 词： | 化工过程 定量风险评价 可接受风险准则 |
Progress in quantitative risk assessment and comparative analysis of risk criteria in chemical process |
| |
| WEI Lijun,,WANG Rujun,,DUO Yingquan,,HU Xinsheng.Progress in quantitative risk assessment and comparative analysis of risk criteria in chemical process[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(8):12-17. |
| |
| Authors: | WEI Lijun WANG Rujun DUO Yingquan HU Xinsheng |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1. China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Major Hazard Control and Accident Emergency Technology, State Administration of Work Safety, Beijing 100012, China;
3. College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | To study the progress in quantitative risk assessment of chemical process, and carry out the comparative analysis of risk criteria, the development status of quantitative risk assessment in several countries were analyzed from three aspects of the source of method, the progress of laws and regulations, and the development of software technology through hackling the development history of quantitative risk assessment. The similarities and differences of risk criteria in each country were analyzed combining with the comparative results of the individual and societal acceptable risk criteria in UK, Netherlands, United States and China. In addition, the criteria contents of chemical process safety control in Germany and Japan were illustrated. The results showed that the quantitative risk assessment technology in China started relatively late, but the formulation of implementation guidelines and risk criteria and the development of assessment software reflected that the development of the method and theory system on quantitative risk assessment in China was relatively complete. |
| |
| Keywords: | chemical process quantitative risk assessment acceptable risk criteria |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国安全生产科学技术》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国安全生产科学技术》下载全文 |
|
