首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

考虑驾驶方式的车辆与航空器交叉冲突评估*
引用本文:康瑞,杨凯.考虑驾驶方式的车辆与航空器交叉冲突评估*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(2):218-223.
作者姓名:康瑞  杨凯
作者单位:(1.中国民用航空飞行学院 空中交通管理学院,四川 广汉 618307;2.四川大学 视觉合成图形图像技术国防重点学科实验室,四川 成都 610064;3.四川大学 计算机学院,四川 成都 610064)
基金项目:* 基金项目: 四川省科技计划项目(2021YFG0171,2022YFG0196);中央高校基本科研业务费基金项目(ZJ2021-05)
摘    要:为量化不同驾驶方式下车辆与航空器行驶风险,提出车辆与航空器交叉运行冲突评估模型,该模型将特种车辆驾驶方式分为激进、稳定、保守3类,综合驾驶特性和管制规则定义车辆速度演化规律,结合运行场景、间隔配备等要素确定冲突条件,并基于航空器与车辆实时速度、位置变化构造冲突评估模型。研究结果表明:冲突评估模型能够计算车辆与航空器在十型交叉口的冲突概率;激进方式下车辆先于航空器通过交叉口,风险概率均值相对最大,为0.679;保守方式下航空器先于车辆通过交叉口,最大间隔是安全间隔的4.7倍;稳定驾驶方式可兼顾安全和效率。本文模型能再现十型道口车辆与航空器交叉运行冲突产生、发展及解脱过程,计算结果可用于场面实时冲突识别和预警,能够为机场危险源识别和风险管控提供依据。

关 键 词:空中交通管理  航空安全  交叉运行  驾驶方式  风险评估

Assessment on cross conflict of vehicle and aircraft considering driving modes
KANG Rui,YANG Kai.Assessment on cross conflict of vehicle and aircraft considering driving modes[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2023,19(2):218-223.
Authors:KANG Rui  YANG Kai
Affiliation:(1.School of Air Traffic Management,Civil Aviation Flight University of China,Guanghan Sichuan 618307,China;2.National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610064,China;3.College of Computer Science,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610064,China)
Abstract:In order to quantify the driving risk of vehicle and aircraft under different driving modes,an assessment model on the cross running conflict of vehicle and aircraft was proposed.The model divided the driving modes of special vehicle into three categories: aggressive,stable and conservative.The evolution law of vehicle speed was defined based on the driving characteristics and control rules,then the conflict conditions were determined in combination with the running scenes,separation establishment and other elements,and the conflict assessment model was constructed based on the real-time speed and position change of aircraft and vehicle.The results showed that the conflict assessment model could calculate the conflict probability of vehicle and aircraft at the cruciform intersection.Under the aggressive mode,the vehicle passed through the intersection before aircraft,and the average risk probability was 0.679,which was the maximum of the three modes.Under the conservative mode,the aircraft passed through the intersection before vehicle,and the maximum separation was 4.7 times of the safety separation.The stable driving mode could meet both safety and efficiency.This model can reproduce the generation,development and liberation process of cross running conflict between vehicle and aircraft at the cruciform intersection,and the calculation results can be used for airport real-time conflict identification and early warning,and provide the basis for the hazard source identification and risk control.
Keywords:air traffic management  aviation safety  cross running  driving mode  risk assessment
点击此处可从《中国安全生产科学技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国安全生产科学技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号