膨胀颗粒污泥床反应器处理啤酒废水

对接种市政消化污泥的膨胀颗粒污泥床（EGSB）反应器的启动及启动成功后在35℃和15℃时的运行特性进行了研究。结果表明：EGSB反应器采用低进水COD、高有机负荷方式，46d快速启动成功；在35℃、HRT为3．4h、液体上升流速为2．80m／h的条件下，COD去除率均能保持在90．0％以上；温度在进水COD为450mg／L左右时对COD去除率影响不明显，但在1700mg／L左右时影响明显；EGSB反应器能在15℃的低温条件下稳定高效运行；在短时间内经历15℃→50℃→15℃的温度冲击和4．32kg／（m^3·d）到15．50kg／（m^3·d）的负荷冲击后能在8d和14d内快速恢复；经历35℃→17℃→35℃的温度冲击后，COD去除率的恢复没有出现滞后期。     

用内循环式生物系统处理炼油废水

采用内循环式生物系统处理炼油废水，以内循环式水解酸化反应器、好氧流化床、模块化设计的生物接触氧化池作为生物反应器进行中试试验。在进水COD为1231．0mg／L、温度为45℃、水力停留时间为23．1～52．0h的条件下，COD去除率稳定在83．9％以上；在进水COD为296．9mg／L时，可通过切换至低负荷的模块化工艺使出水水质达标。该系统对一定范围内的水力负荷和有机负荷的冲击均有较好的缓冲能力和灵活处理能力。     

用高效优势菌强化升流式厌氧污泥床的废水处理性能

针对酒精废水中难生物降解的有机物,从氧化塘污泥中筛选分离出高适应能力和降解能力的高效优势菌群,将其投加到升流式厌氧污泥床反应器中进行中试。运行结果表明:利用高效优势菌群培养高活性的颗粒污泥,可大大强化UASB反应器的废水处理性能,35d即可完成系统的启动;反应器容积负荷从2.0kg/(m3.d)提高到39.0kg/(m3.d),COD去除率保持在90%左右,最高达到96%。     

两种接触氧化填料处理洗涤剂废水的比较

以某日化企业在生产过程中产生的洗涤剂废水为处理对象,以接触氧化法为核心工艺,比较了悬挂式组合填料和移动床生物膜反应器(MBBR)悬浮填料对洗涤剂废水的处理效果。实验结果表明:悬挂式组合填料和MBBR悬浮填料的挂膜启动时间分别为13,25 d;当悬挂式组合填料反应器的DO为4.0 mg/L时,COD和LAS的去除率分别为84.33%和89.06%;当MBBR悬浮填料反应器的DO为3.0 mg/L时,COD和LAS的去除率分别为82.54%和90.31%;当MBBR悬浮填料反应器的COD容积负荷为0.5~1.3 kg/(m3·d)时,平均COD去除率为83.91%,继续增大COD容积负荷,COD去除率仍能保持在80%以上;MBBR悬浮填料在COD的高效降解及高浓度有机废水的处理方面优于悬挂式组合填料。     

EGSB—MBBR处理高浓度聚酯废水

采用膨胀床颗粒污泥反应器(EGSB)—移动床生物膜反应器(MBBR)处理高浓度、难降解(COD≥10000mg/L,BOD5/COD0.3)聚酯废水。实验结果表明:在(37±1)℃、停留时间(HRT)为15.4h、进水COD为10000mg/L的条件下,EGSB反应器容积负荷达5.31kg/(m3.d),COD去除率达95%以上;在室温、HRT为48.0h的条件下,MBBR反应器出水COD100mg/L,BOD530mg/L,出水水质达到GB8978—1996《污水综合排放标准》中的一级排放标准。     

UASB-SBR工艺处理阿维菌素废水

采用UASB-SBR 组合工艺处理阿维菌素废水,考察了UASB 反应器和SBR 反应器中COD 的去除效果.UASB 反应器稳定运行阶段,当进水COD 为9 210 mg / L、容积负荷为9.21 kg（/ m3·d）时,COD 去除率稳定在85%左右.SBR 反应器稳定运行阶段,当进水COD 为1 010 mg /...     

UASB反应器反硝化处理工业废水

采用絮状污泥成功启动升流式厌氧污泥床(UASB)反应器处理含甲酸、苯胺、环已酮、NO3-等的工业废水。UASB反应器以低负荷启动,10天后逐渐提高进水COD,出水COD保持在710~770 mg/L,COD去除率为40%~60%;出水TOC保持在115~314 mg/L,TOC去除率由60.3%逐渐升高至87.2%,最终维持在81%左右;出水中ρ(NO3-)维持在134~176 mg/L,NO3-去除率为90%左右,系统稳定后NO3-去除率几乎为100%。在进水COD容积负荷不超过5.00 kg/(m3·d)的条件下,实际COD容积负荷稳定在2.00 kg/(m3·d)左右,实际TOC容积负荷稳定在1.00 kg/(m3·d)以上。当进水COD容积负荷不大于4.48 kg/(m3·d)时,COD去除率为55%~74%,TOC去除率为63%~87%,NO3-去除率大于95%。     

麦迪霉素废水的两级好氧处理

采用三相生物流化床－生物接触固定床两级串联好氧生物处理流程，可处理ＣＯＤ高达２００００ｍｇ／Ｌ的麦迪霉素高浓度有机废水，两床的容积负荷分别为４．４４和０．８９ｋｇＣＯＤ／ｄ·ｍ＾３以下时，其ＣＯＤ和ＢＯＤ的去除率均在９０％以上，出水水质较好。本流程能够承受高浓度有机物的冲击负荷，对进水中的麦迪霉素和酚类物质有较强的适应能力，可保持稳定运行。     

AEB反应器反硝化处理高浓度硝酸盐废水

采用缺氧膨胀床(AEB)反应器处理高浓度硝酸盐废水,研究了反应器的快速启动和挂膜特性,以及在反硝化连续流运行条件下对废水的处理效果。实验结果表明:采用自然挂膜方式,填料层从下至上生物膜厚度逐渐增加;AEB的快速启动8 d可完成,COD去除率由44.9%升至92.3%,NO_3~--N去除率由39.8%升至98.4%;稳定运行阶段(进水COD 4 628～5 548 mg/L、ρ(NO_3~--N) 1 339～1 505 mg/L),COD去除率稳定在95%左右,NO_3~--N去除率稳定在98%～99%,COD和NO_3~--N的容积负荷去除量最高可达27.8 kg/(m~3·d)和7.3 kg/(m~3·d)。     

Fenton试剂氧化—石灰法处理苎麻脱胶废水

采用Fenton试剂氧化一石灰法处理苎麻脱胶废水（简称废水）。在pH为8．3的废水中FeSO4·7H2O、H2O2、饱和石灰乳的加入量分别为1．5g／L、1．0mL／L和1．0mL／L的条件下对废水进行处理，废水COD由650mg／L降至200mg／L以下，COD去除率约为70％；色度由500倍降至70倍以下，色度去除率约为90％，出水COD和色度均达到GB8978-1996（污水综合排放标准）中的二级排放标准。     

精对苯二甲酸废水处理技术及优化

介绍了PTA废水的水质、水量特点和国内PTA生产企业废水处理现状;推荐了PTA废水的优化预处理工艺、优化主体处理工艺、加强管理减少废水排放的主要措施;指出了目前存在的问题及今后的发展方向。     

PTA废液回收利用技术

介绍了从精对苯二甲酸（PTA）废液中回收醋酸,邻、对苯二甲酸,醋酸钴锰盐的回收工艺。醋酸得率为90％,邻、对苯二甲酸得率为70％,醋酸钴锰盐得率为95％。该技术成熟、合理,具有较好的经济效益和环境效益。     

回收PTA废料生产增塑剂

介绍了扬子石化公司ＰＴＡ生产过程中所排各种废料的分离提纯及回收利用，对难以回收的氧化残渣的分离回收和利用作了重点论述。提供了用所回收的ＴＡ和混合苯二甲本乡生产剂的工艺流程和工艺参数。     

用高效液相色谱法分析精对苯二甲酸残渣

用高效液相色谱法分析精对苯二甲酸残渣，考察了适宜的操作条件。实验结果表明，在采用阴离子交换柱作分析柱，浓度为0．2mol／L的磷酸二氢铵缓冲液为流动相、体积分数为10％的甲醇作有机改性剂、用磷酸调试样pH为6—7、检测波长为240nm的最佳条件下，分离效果最好，对羧基苯甲醛、苯甲酸、对甲基苯甲酸、邻苯二甲酸、对苯二甲酸、间苯二甲酸、1，2，4-苯三酸、1，3，5-苯三酸的加标回收率分别为98．39％，98．81％，98．66％，97．73％，98．93％，98．90％，98．25％，98．40％。相对标准偏差分别为0．87％，0．49％，0．76％，0．88％，0．71％，0．46％，0．63％，0．47％，方法的检出限分别为0．1，0．2，0．1，0．4，0．1，0．4，0．6，2．0mg／L，线性范围分别为0．88-17．50，1．48～29．60，1．47～29．30，1．34～26．80，1．79～35．80，2．70～53．90，2．98～59．50，3．00～59．90mg／L。     

精对苯二甲酸生产企业挥发性有机物泄漏检测与排放估算

采用泄漏检测与修复(LDAR)技术分析了某精对苯二甲酸生产装置动静密封点的泄漏情况,共完成1 367个密封点的现场LDAR检测,测出28个泄漏点,总泄漏检出率为2.05%。其中储存单元的泄漏点数量较氧化单元和精制单元高,泄漏程度也较严重。泄漏点主要集中在法兰、开口管线和泵三类密封点;涉及轻液的泄漏密封点数量较多。依据LDAR检测结果,采用相关方程法估算设备动静密封点泄漏产生的挥发性有机物(VOCs)排放量约为4.999 t/a。法兰的VOCs泄漏排放量最大,约占63.89%,其次是泵和采样连接系统,占泄漏排放量的20.78%和7.89%。     

树脂吸附—Fenton氧化法处理精对苯二甲酸废水

采用树脂吸附-Fenton加氧化法处理精对苯二甲酸（PTA）废水,考察了树脂吸附及Fenton氧化的最佳工艺条件。实验结果表明,采用NDA-88吸附树脂,在室温、吸附流速2BV／h条件下,每批次处理量为28BV,COD去除率为80％左右;采用Fenton试剂进一步氧化处理,在废水pH为3、质量分数30％的8202加入量为1．2％（体积分数）、H2O2与Fe^2＋摩尔比为3：1、反应温度为40℃、反应时间为4h条件下,出水COD为72mg／L,COD去除率为87％,可达到国家一级排放标准。     

Distribution of Cd,Ck, Pb and Zn in Soil and Vegetation Compartments in Stands of Five Boreal Tree Species in N.E. Sweden

Concentrations and total quantity of cadmium (Cd), cupper (Cu),lead (Pb) and zink (Zn) were determined in biomass and soil compartments in a replicated tree species experiment with 27-yr-old stands growing on former farmland in N.E. Sweden. Sequentialextractions of soil samples were performed in order to estimate the exchangeable and an organically bound fraction of each element. The tree species included were Picea abies (L.)H. Karst., Pinus sylvestris L., Pinus contorta Dougl., Larix sibirica Ledeb., and Betula pendula Roth.Tree species influenced the rate of removal of Cu, Pb and Zn incase of stemwood harvesting, and of Cd, Cu and Zn in the case ofwhole-tree harvesting. B. pendula and P. abies had higher quantities and average concentrations of Zn in the biomass. For all species, >50% of the Zn in the stems was found in the bark. P. abies and L. sibirica had higher quantities of Cu in the biomass than the other species.P. abies and P. contorta had high quantities of Cd inthe biomass in relation to the other species. Branches and stembark contained high concentrations of Cd and Pb in relation to foliage and stemwood. Dead branches had especially high concentrations of Pb. The high accumulation rate of Zn in thebiomass of B. pendula was related to a low exchangeable amount of Zn in the A horizon. In the superficial centimeters ofthe A horizon, a depletion similar to that found for Zn was detected for Cu, whereas for Cd and Pb, no correlations were found between quantities of elements in the trees and element pools in the soil.     

Programs assessing implementation and effectiveness of state forest practice rules and BMPs in the West

The major forest nonpoint source control programs in the West are largely regulatory, either under forest practices acts (California, Idaho, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) or a streamside management act (Montana). These programs and the specific rules they enforce continue to undergo intensive scrutiny. Still, the questions are the same for these regulatory programs as for states that base nonpoint source control on voluntary BMPs (Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming). Are the rules or BMPs being applied, and are they effective in reducing nonpoint source pollution to levels that protect beneficial uses of water? The level of debate about forestry in the West has resulted in detailed monitoring and research to answer these questions. In the past, state agencies have assumed levels of BMP compliance based on the percent of operations without enforcement actions. These estimates are being replaced by statistically valid and reproducible monitoring of forest practices rules and BMP compliance levels. BMP effectiveness is being assessed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. This can involve field assessments, process-based research, and control watershed studies. Some trend monitoring is also beginning. With the regional implementation rate for forestry BMPs at about 94% and rising, it is likely that effectiveness testing will continue to be a priority and consume the majority of assessment resources for this region.     

Starch-plastic materials—Preparation,physical properties,and biodegradability (a review of recent USDA research)

Recent starch-plastic research at the National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research is reviewed and related worldwide efforts are noted. Properties of starch that influence its formulation and performance in plastics are discussed. Methods are given for preparation of starch-poly(methyl acrylate) graft copolymer, starch-poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid), and starch-poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid)-polyethylene plastics. Their physical properties are discussed, as is degradability by enzymes or amylolytic organisms from soil, ponds, and streams.The mention of firm names or trade products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over other firms or similar products not mentioned.