温州市鳌江水系叶绿素a和氮、磷的分布特征与富营养化研究

为探究温州市鳌江水系氮、磷污染特征,选取17个采样断面,于2022年1月、2022年6月进行两次水样采集,并据此对水体理化指标、氮磷浓度与叶绿素a(Chl-a)的时空分布特征进行研究,利用灰色关联度分析方法判别理化指标、氮磷营养盐与Chl-a的相关性。同时运用氮磷比判定鳌江水系的营养限制因子,并初步判定鳌江水系的富营养化程度。结果表明：Chl-a、氮磷营养盐浓度存在时空差异;根据灰色关联度判定总氮、溶解性无机氮、氨氮是鳌江水系枯水期Chl-a的主要影响因子,氨氮、溶解性总磷和可溶性磷酸盐是丰水期Chl-a的主要影响因子;鳌江水系在丰水期主要表现为磷限制状态,枯水期主要表现为氮、磷共同限制状态;鳌江水系富营养化评价结果显示丰水期富营养化较严重,下游河段较上游河段严重。     

东江干流富营养化评价及区域差异性研究

利用综合营养状态指数评价东江富营养化状况.结果表明,东江富营养化程度较轻,干流绝大部分区域(96％)为中营养及中营养以下水平,只有少数区域(4％)达到富营养水平.同时,东江干流富营养化程度区域差异性明显,从上游至下游河口富营养化程度逐渐加重.针对东江水质污染现状,建议东江水体管理应以保护为主,同时采取有效措施,改善下游...     

湖泊富营养化评价方法

湖泊富营养化是营养物质在水体内积蓄过多而造成水体从生产力低的贫营养状态逐步向生产力高的富营养状态过渡的一种现象。富营养化的水体由于:1.浮游植物和低级的水生植物大量繁殖,降低了水源水质,增加了水处理成本,从而给工业用水和生活用水造成困难。2.过量繁殖的藻类,常常持续地浮泛水面,引起“水花”现象(又称水华或湖淀)。     

城市景观河道营养状况与轮虫群落结构

为了解城市景观河道治理过程水质与轮虫群落结构的关系,于2012年5月至2014年12月对江苏省常州市景观河道进行了调查。利用综合营养状态指数法对景观河道的营养状况进行评价;并通过轮虫群落种类组成、优势种、生物量及多样性指数等指标探讨了轮虫群落结构与水体营养水平之间的关系。结果表明,景观河道总体处于富营养状态,主要是由河道中氮磷等污染物浓度过高引起;调查期间检出轮虫共22种,其中优势种为萼花臂尾轮虫(479个·L-1)、蒲达臂尾轮虫(98个·L-1)以及针簇多肢轮虫(137个·L-1);轮虫总数量处于较低水平(312个·L-1),多样性水平不高,轮虫数量与各污染物营养状态指数呈负相关;生物量与总氮营养状态指数呈极显著负相关。     

北方典型干旱缺水型河流氮磷时空分布特征与富营养化评价

以北方典型干旱缺水型河流-滏阳河流域邢台段为研究对象,通过为期1年(2013年6月—2014年5月)的水质监测,阐述了流域内氮磷时空变化特征及富营养化水平。结果表明,流域内水体TN的平均质量浓度为28.27 mg·L~(-1)(其中NH_4~+-N占67.94%),TP的平均质量浓度为1.37 mg·L~(-1)(其中SRP占62.01%);流域内氮磷时空分布特征明显:在时间尺度上,水体中氮磷浓度均呈现出旱季(9月—次年5月)高于雨季(6—8月);空间尺度上,氮磷质量浓度分布差异明显且均呈现出市区流域高于市郊流域,沿河流流向逐渐减少的趋势;对数型幂函数普适指数公式对水体富营养化的评价结果显示:无论从时间尺度上还是空间尺度上,所有采样点都处于极富营养状态,其变化趋势与氮磷有明显的一致性,同时富营养化程度与地区污染水平呈现一定的相关性。水资源匮乏以及河流湖库化严重是造成该地区水体富营养化问题突出的主要原因。     

天目湖富营养化现状研究

基于2005年天目湖(沙河水库)库体和取水口水质监测资料,分析其水库水质和富营养化状况.结果表明,全年水库透明度为3.10±0.14 m,总氮为0.455±0.036 mg/L,总磷为0.017±0.004 mg/L,N/P比的均值为28.8±9.5,浮游植物生长主要受营养盐磷的限制.采用总氮、总磷、透明度、高锰酸盐指数、溶解氧五项指标作为参数的富营养状态指数,评价结果表明,沙河水库水体营养水平较低,处于贫营养状态.     

不同再生水补水比例下景观水体的水质变化

缺水地区再生水补充景观水体具有重要的意义,因此考察不同再生水补水比例条件下的水质变化尤为重要。采用修建人工景观水池的方法,模拟不同再生水补水比例条件下景观水体的水质变化规律。将某水厂的再生水和自来水按不同比例配水作为人工水池的进水和补水,水力停留时间固定为5 d。实验结果表明当该再生水所占比例为75%、50%时,水质恶化最快,100%和25%时由于营养比例失衡,水质恶化速度较慢。此外,叶绿素a的增长主要受氮磷营养盐浓度的影响,并影响着水体的浊度、色度和透明度,进而破坏景观水体的感官指标。     

长春南湖营养盐与叶绿素a的分布与富营养化评价

在研究长春南湖水体中TP、TN和叶绿素a的时空分布及相关性的基础上,采用综合富营养化指数法对南湖水体进行评价。结果表明:(1)常温期,TP、TN和叶绿素a含量均为9月5月;9月的TP、TN为表层底层,叶绿素a含量为底层表层;5月的TP、TN和叶绿素a的含量均为底层表层;TP为渔场保护区人为活动区荷花池区,TN和叶绿素a含量均为渔场保护区荷花池区人为活动区。(2)冰封期,TP、TN和叶绿素a含量为水层冰层;TP、叶绿素a含量为渔场保护区人为活动区,TN为人为活动区渔场保护区。与常温期相比,TP、TN和叶绿素a含量总体上均为9月5月2月;各区水体中TP和叶绿素a含量的分布与常温期保持一致,而TN的分布有一定的变化。(3)相对于氮,磷含量的高低是控制藻类及浮游生物生长更为关键的因子。(4)9月的营养级别是中度富营养,2月的营养级别是中营养,5月的营养级别是轻度富营养。综合营养状态指数大小依次为9月5月2月。常温期不同功能区的营养级别均属轻度富营养。     

包头市南海湿地水污染现状与防治对策研究

通过对南海湿地进出水和核心区进行布点采样,检测了样品的氮磷和有机污染物,分析了湿地水污染现状,同时采用内梅罗污染指数法和综合营养状态指数法对湿地水质进行评价。结果表明:南海湿地水体达到污染级别,其中湿地进水区域和旅游开发区水质达到重污染级别;南海湿地现已处于富营养型。通过分析得出水污染的原因主要是:该地区人口多,人为污染大,南海湿地补水来源受污染严重;对水质净化具有一定作用的水生植物不被收割利用,对水质造成了二次污染。最终针对南海湿地的污染状况和原因,提出了科学合理的防治对策。     

再生水补水人工湖水域聚类划分及水质指标时空分布特征

以天津临港生态湿地公园人工湖水质和水文的调查数据为依据,运用相关性分析和聚类分析将研究水体划分为3类水域。研究了不同聚类水域水温、DO、p H、氮磷营养元素以及Chla的时空分布特征。结果显示,DO、硝态氮、TN、TP与流速呈显著正相关,水温、SS与流速呈显著负相关。Chla与水深呈显著正相关,TN、硝态氮与水深呈显著负相关。断面宽度与所有理化指标均没有显著相关性。3种水域在监测期间N/P比(TN/TP)显示湖泊正在从氮营养元素限制型(N/P7)向适宜藻类生长的营养类型过渡。富营养化评价显示,再生水为补水的临港人工湖在监测期间水质已处于中度富营养,主要贡献因子为COD和TP。     

受污染水体的水质恢复方法

大量未经处理的污水排入水体时 ,会导致地面水体严重污染。受污染水体的水质恢复方法有物理法、化学法和生物法 ,它们能控制水体外源性和内源性污染物的排入量、人工强化水体自身的净化能力 ,以降低水体中污染物的浓度、提高溶解氧浓度 ,恢复水生生物的多样性     

扬水曝气技术在水源水质改善中的应用

扬水曝气技术是新开发的水质改善技术,用于混合上下水层、控制藻类生长、增加水体溶解氧、抑制底泥污染物释放.将该技术应用于某水源地,其提水效率达到同类设备--同温层曝气器的两倍;控制了水体表层的藻类数量,抑制了藻类的生长,将藻类叶绿素a含量降低了13.96%.扬水曝气技术的适用条件:用于控制藻类生长时,水深应不小于10 m;用于抑制底泥污染物释放时,水体应存在溶解氧小于1～2 mg/L的厌氧条件.     

Adapting a geographical information system-based water resource management to the needs of the Romanian water authorities

Background, aim, and scope  

The need for global and integrated approaches to water resources management, both from the quantitative and the qualitative point of view, has long been recognized. Water quality management is a major issue for sustainable development and a mandatory task with respect to the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive as well as the Swiss legislation. However, data modelling to develop relational databases and subsequent geographic information system (GIS)-based water management instruments are a rather recent and not that widespread trend. The publication of overall guidelines for data modelling along with the EU Water Framework Directive is an important milestone in this area. Improving overall water quality requires better and more easily accessible data, but also the possibility to link data to simulation models. Models are to be used to derive indicators that will in turn support decision-making processes. For this whole chain to become effective at a river basin scale, all its components have to become part of the current daily practice of the local water administration. Any system, tool, or instrument that is not designed to meet, first of all, the fundamental needs of its primary end-users has almost no chance to be successful in the longer term.     

Adapting a geographical information system-based water resource management to the needs of the Romanian water authorities

Background, aim, and scope

The need for global and integrated approaches to water resources management, both from the quantitative and the qualitative point of view, has long been recognized. Water quality management is a major issue for sustainable development and a mandatory task with respect to the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive as well as the Swiss legislation. However, data modelling to develop relational databases and subsequent geographic information system (GIS)-based water management instruments are a rather recent and not that widespread trend. The publication of overall guidelines for data modelling along with the EU Water Framework Directive is an important milestone in this area. Improving overall water quality requires better and more easily accessible data, but also the possibility to link data to simulation models. Models are to be used to derive indicators that will in turn support decision-making processes. For this whole chain to become effective at a river basin scale, all its components have to become part of the current daily practice of the local water administration. Any system, tool, or instrument that is not designed to meet, first of all, the fundamental needs of its primary end-users has almost no chance to be successful in the longer term.

Materials and methods

Although based on a pre-existing water resources management system developed in Switzerland, the methodological approach applied to develop a GIS-based water quality management system adapted to the Romanian context followed a set of well-defined steps: the first and very important step is the assessment of needs (on the basis of a careful analysis of the various activities and missions of the water administration and other relevant stakeholders in water management related issues). On that basis, a conceptual data model (CDM) can be developed, to be later on turned into a physical database. Finally, the specifically requested additional functionalities (i.e. functionalities not provided by classical commercial GIS software), also identified during the assessment of needs, are developed. This methodology was applied, on an experimental basin, in the Ialomita River basin.

Results

The results obtained from this action-research project consist of a set of tangible elements, among which (1) a conceptual data model adapted to the Romanian specificities regarding water resources management (needs, data availability, etc.), (2) a related spatial relational database (objects and attributes in tables, links, etc.), that can be used to store the data collected, among others, by the water administration, and later on exploited with geographical information systems, (3) a toolbar (in the ESRI environment) offering the requested data processing and visualizing functionalities. Lessons learned from this whole process can be considered as additional, although less tangible, results.

Discussion

The applied methodology is fairly classical and did not come up with revolutionary results. Actually, the interesting aspects of this work are, on the one hand, and obviously, the fact that it produced tools matching the needs of the local (if not national) water administration (i.e. with a good chance of being effectively used in the day-to-day practice), and, on the other hand, the adaptations and adjustments that were needed both at the staff level and in technical terms.

Conclusions

This research showed that a GIS-based water management system needs to be backed by some basic data management tools that form the necessary support upon which a GIS can be deployed. The main lesson gained is that technology transfer has to pay much attention to the differences in existing situations and backgrounds in general, and therefore must be able to show much flexibility. The fact that the original objectives could be adapted to meet the real needs of the local end-users is considered as a major aspect in achieving a successful adaptation and development of water resources management tools. Time needed to setup things in real life was probably the most underestimated aspect in this technology transfer process.

Recommendations and perspectives

The whole material produced (conceptual data model, database and GIS tools) was disseminated among all river basin authorities in Romania on the behalf of the national water administration (ANAR). The fact that further developments, for example, to address water quantity issues more precisely, as envisaged by ANAR, can be seen as an indication that this project succeeded in providing an appropriate input to improve water quality in Romania on the long term.

     

Adapting a geographical information system-based water resource management to the needs of the Romanian water authorities

Background, aim, and scope

The need for global and integrated approaches to water resources management, both from the quantitative and the qualitative point of view, has long been recognized. Water quality management is a major issue for sustainable development and a mandatory task with respect to the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive as well as the Swiss legislation. However, data modelling to develop relational databases and subsequent geographic information system (GIS)-based water management instruments are a rather recent and not that widespread trend. The publication of overall guidelines for data modelling along with the EU Water Framework Directive is an important milestone in this area. Improving overall water quality requires better and more easily accessible data, but also the possibility to link data to simulation models. Models are to be used to derive indicators that will in turn support decision-making processes. For this whole chain to become effective at a river basin scale, all its components have to become part of the current daily practice of the local water administration. Any system, tool, or instrument that is not designed to meet, first of all, the fundamental needs of its primary end-users has almost no chance to be successful in the longer term.

Materials and methods

Although based on a pre-existing water resources management system developed in Switzerland, the methodological approach applied to develop a GIS-based water quality management system adapted to the Romanian context followed a set of well-defined steps: the first and very important step is the assessment of needs (on the basis of a careful analysis of the various activities and missions of the water administration and other relevant stakeholders in water management related issues). On that basis, a conceptual data model (CDM) can be developed, to be later on turned into a physical database. Finally, the specifically requested additional functionalities (i.e. functionalities not provided by classical commercial GIS software), also identified during the assessment of needs, are developed. This methodology was applied, on an experimental basin, in the Ialomita River basin.

Results

The results obtained from this action-research project consist of a set of tangible elements, among which (1) a conceptual data model adapted to the Romanian specificities regarding water resources management (needs, data availability, etc.), (2) a related spatial relational database (objects and attributes in tables, links, etc.), that can be used to store the data collected, among others, by the water administration, and later on exploited with geographical information systems, (3) a toolbar (in the ESRI environment) offering the requested data processing and visualizing functionalities. Lessons learned from this whole process can be considered as additional, although less tangible, results.

Discussion

The applied methodology is fairly classical and did not come up with revolutionary results. Actually, the interesting aspects of this work are, on the one hand, and obviously, the fact that it produced tools matching the needs of the local (if not national) water administration (i.e. with a good chance of being effectively used in the day-to-day practice), and, on the other hand, the adaptations and adjustments that were needed both at the staff level and in technical terms.

Conclusions

This research showed that a GIS-based water management system needs to be backed by some basic data management tools that form the necessary support upon which a GIS can be deployed. The main lesson gained is that technology transfer has to pay much attention to the differences in existing situations and backgrounds in general, and therefore must be able to show much flexibility. The fact that the original objectives could be adapted to meet the real needs of the local end-users is considered as a major aspect in achieving a successful adaptation and development of water resources management tools. Time needed to setup things in real life was probably the most underestimated aspect in this technology transfer process.

Recommendations and perspectives

The whole material produced (conceptual data model, database and GIS tools) was disseminated among all river basin authorities in Romania on the behalf of the national water administration (ANAR). The fact that further developments, for example, to address water quantity issues more precisely, as envisaged by ANAR, can be seen as an indication that this project succeeded in providing an appropriate input to improve water quality in Romania on the long term.

     

盐城蟒蛇河饮用水源原水水质及盐龙湖工程水质净化效果评价

蟒蛇河是盐城市区主要的地表饮用水源地,其水质通常在Ⅳ~Ⅴ类标准。为改善原水水质,中国首个平原上开挖的饮用水源生态净化湖——盐龙湖于2012年6月建成启用。通过水质监测,分析了近年来蟒蛇河原水水质及其污染特征,并对盐龙湖工程水质的净化效果进行了评价。研究表明:(1)蟒蛇河原水在春、秋、冬季水质主要指标基本能满足《地表水环境质量标准》(GB3838-2002)Ⅲ类标准,但夏季水质相对较差;(2)蟒蛇河原水呈现出典型的有机污染特征,营养盐类多是以有机形态存在,但TN与TP的主要污染来源并不一致,在不同季节原水污染特性存在波动规律;(3)近年来蟒蛇河原水中有机物及营养盐浓度有升高趋势;(4)盐龙湖工程水质净化效果在夏季最佳,春、秋季次之,冬季则一般;(5)近一年来,盐龙湖工程累计削减原水高锰酸盐指数、氨氮、TN、TP、SS的量分别达到56.6、35.6、59.8、8.9、1 000.0t(干质量)。     

基于水质污染风险识别的人工湖需水研究

人工湖需水量是指维持湖区水量平衡、满足人工湖水质目标的供水量,人工湖需水量确定是人工湖水体工程设计的主要内容之一。以上虞滨海新城建设的人工湖为例,分析了人工湖建成后的可能污染源,采用TP质量守恒模型,预测了不同生活污水截污率、生态措施作用前后的人工湖需水量及水质要求。结果表明,当生活污水截污率为100%时,若供水TP≤0.10mg/L,则人工湖需水量为240万t/a;当生活污水截污率为95%时,若供水TP=0.05mg/L,不考虑生态措施作用,则人工湖需水量为1 600万t/a;当生活污水截污率为95%时,若供水TP=0.05mg/L,在生态措施作用下人工湖需水量为730万t/a。     

饮用水功能区水环境健康风险阈值体系研究

结合天津市饮用水功能区水环境现状,筛选出14种特征污染物,通过危害识别将其分为化学致癌物、非致癌有毒物和特殊物质3类。针对不同类别污染物建立健康风险评价模型,给出化学致癌物的致癌强度系数、非致癌有毒物参考剂量、人均寿命、不同年龄段人群日均饮水量和平均体重等参数,建立针对不同人群的饮用水功能区水质风险阈值体系。在此基础上,对天津市饮用水功能区——于桥水库进行水质风险进行评价。结果显示,于桥水库国控监测点位10个监测指标中,氨氮、挥发酚、汞、铅具有健康风险,4个指标的浓度均处于10-7的风险水平以下,说明于桥水库水环境健康程度较好,4个指标对成人及儿童的风险水平排序为铅氨氮汞挥发酚,重金属铅是主要健康风险污染物。