固相萃取技术在水体有机物分析中的应用

本文简述了固相萃取技术（ＳＰＥ）的原理、方法及特点,阐述了ＳＰＥ和气相色谱（ＧＣ）在线与离线两种联用技术应用于水样中有机化合物的分析,并着重介绍了ＳＰＥＧＣ应用于分析水环境中痕量多氯有机化合物,包括多氯联苯化合物（ＰＣＢｓ）和有机氯农药（ＯＣＰｓ）的方法进展情况     

痕量壬基酚及相关化合物的样品预处理和测定

对近年来环境样品中痕量内分泌干扰物壬基酚及相关化合物的分离富集方法和测定技术的研究进展进行了综合评述。重点讨论了索氏提取、液液萃取、液膜分离、回流萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取、超临界流体萃取、超声提取八种样品预处理方法和气相色谱质谱联用、高效液相色谱两种测定方法,而且针对以上方面提出了尚需进一步研究的问题。     

固相微萃取-毛细管气相色谱法测定水中的低分子醛、酮、醇

固相微萃取是一种快速、简便、集萃取浓缩于一体的样品前处理技术,具有分析快速、灵敏度高、无需有机溶剂的优点.用固相微萃取-毛细管气相色谱分析水中甲醇、丙酮、异丙醇、乙醇、乙腈、丙烯腈,检出限可达0.003～0.03 mg/L.     

固相微萃取-毛细管气相色谱法快速分析水中酞酸酯

用固相微萃取富集水中酞酸酯，毛细管气相色谱分离分析，整个分析过程只需50min，检出限可达0.01-40.0μg／L，实验表明，固相微萃取是一种快速、简便、集萃取浓缩进样于一体的样品前处理技术，具有分析时间短、灵敏度高、无需有机溶剂的优点，已用于地面水源、海水、饮用水中酞酸酯含量的测定。     

饮用水中异嗅物质-土臭素及二甲基异冰片的测定方法

导致饮用水土霉味的常见物质为土臭素(GSM)和二甲基异冰片(2-MIB),此两种物质通常在原水及饮用水中痕量存在,浓度低于几百ng/L.总结了用感官分析法和仪器分析法测定痕量GSM和2-MIB.对液液萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取及各种衍生水样预处理方法进行了对比,评价了各种方法的优劣,并对异嗅物质分析方法的发展提出了展望.     

热解析-固相微萃取-气相色谱法测定空气样品中挥发性有机化合物

建立了热解析-固相微萃取-气相色谱法测定空气样品中挥发性有机化合物的分析方法，并对色谱分离条件、玻璃针筒保存样品的稳定性、固相微萃取萃取纤维、萃取时间、色谱进样时间等条件进行了优化，9种挥发性有机化合物的峰面积与其质量浓度在所测范围内有较好的线性关系，相对标准偏差＜8.8%，检出限为0.05～0.75 μg/100 mL，满足实际空气样品测定需要。     

空气中挥发性有机物监测技术的研究进展

讨论了空气中挥发性有机化合物（VOCs）的监测分析方法研究进展。重点介绍了空气中VOCs的采集、分析和测定；简要叙述了样品前处理的新方法--固相微萃取法（SPME）与其它前处理方法的研究概况。     

固相微萃取技术在我国环境化学分析中的应用

固相微萃取技术（SPME）是20世纪80年代末发展起来的一种崭新的技术,它集采样、萃取、浓缩、解析、进样为一体,在我国环境化学分析中,SPME和GC、GC／MS等仪器联用分析有机污染物已获得令人满意的结果。同时因其具有简便、快速、灵敏、准确、重现性好、成本低、不使用有机溶剂等优点,因而SPME技术将会得到十分广泛的应用。     

聚丙烯基改性纤维固相萃取水中的苯酚

通过高能电子束辐照的方法,在聚丙烯（PP）纤维基体上分别接枝长链丙烯酸十八酯（SA）和亲水性丙烯酸-β-羟乙酯（HEA）2种单体,并将该纤维作为固相萃取填料,用于固相萃取（SPE）水中的痕量苯酚。研究了SPE过程中上样速度、洗脱溶剂、洗脱体积以及洗脱速度等因素对纤维萃取效果的影响。结果表明,改性纤维对痕量苯酚的富集倍数达95~145倍,回收率达到90%~98%,甲醇对纤维有良好的再生效果,纤维重复使用6次以内时,吸附性能无明显变化。     

固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定地毯中总挥发性有机化合物

建立了一种固相微萃取与气相色谱质谱联用测定地毯中总挥发性有机化合物的方法,该方法简便快速,重现性好,分析结果同小型环境平衡舱法测定的结果比较吻合。     

固相微萃取技术在我国环境化学分析中的应用

固相微萃取技术 (SPME)是 2 0世纪 80年代末发展起来的一种崭新的技术 ,它集采样、萃取、浓缩、解析、进样为一体 ,在我国环境化学分析中 ,SPME和GC、GC/MS等仪器联用分析有机污染物已获得令人满意的结果。同时因其具有简便、快速、灵敏、准确、重现性好、成本低、不使用有机溶剂等优点 ,因而SPME技术将会得到十分广泛的应用     

Hair-biomonitoring of organic pollutants

This report reviews past research on hair analysis development for organic contaminants from the point of view of analytical procedures, successful applications and their limitations. For the past 20 years, hair analysis for organic pollutants has received more and more attention, since it is non-invasive, easily available and ethically not prioritized. New methods such as SFE, SPME and INAA have been developed to make the analysis more accurate and reliable. Furthermore, the correlation of contamination levels between hair samples and ambient air or internal tissues has been found by hair analysis and short-term and long-term exposure assessment in combination. However, there are still some limitations of hair analysis to be a validated risk assessment tool for many compounds. Some limitations had been of the past, some have not been fully investigated and need still further study. In this way, hair analysis can be the key to successfully biomonitor organic contaminations.     

Immersed solid phase microextraction to measure chemical activity of lipophilic organic contaminants in fatty tissue samples

It is known that solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibers can be equilibrated directly within environmental matrices such as water, sediment and soil slurries. Here it is shown that this method can also be applied to biological tissue. SPME extraction of biological matrices reportedly causes lipophilic fouling of the fiber. However, we found no significant measurement bias when combining equilibrium sampling with fiber surface cleaning. The uptake of lipophilic organic pollutants from the tissue and into the SPME fiber coating was characterized by fast equilibrium partitioning without sample depletion and without impacting the sorptive properties of the fiber. The precision of the method when applied to hexachlorobenzene and several PCB congeners in harbor porpoise blubber was 15%, which includes the variation between SPME samplings, manual injections and the instrumental analysis. A good correlation (r(2)=0.95) was obtained between SPME measurements of PCB 153 in blubber and concentrations obtained via a traditional analytical approach. These results indicate that SPME is a promising technique for measuring chemical activity in biological tissue, which would make it a useful tool for studying chemical distribution in organisms as well as biodilution and biomagnification phenomena.     

Air sampling and analysis of volatile organic compounds with solid phase microextraction

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) presents many advantages over conventional analytical methods by combining sampling, preconcentration, and direct transfer of the analytes into a standard gas chromatograph (GC). Since its commercial introduction in the early 1990s, SPME has been successfully applied to the sampling and analysis of environmental samples. This paper presents an overview of the current methods for air sampling and analysis with SPME using both grab and time-weighted average (TWA) modes. Methods include total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), formaldehyde, and several target volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Field sampling data obtained with these methods in indoor air were validated with conventional methods based on sorbent tubes. The advantages and challenges associated with SPME for air sampling are also discussed. SPME is accurate, fast, sensitive, versatile, and cost-efficient, and could serve as a powerful alternative to conventional methods used by the research, industrial, regulatory, and academic communities.     

Comparison between solid-phase extraction methods for the chromatographic determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) procedure has been developed to extract eight organophosphorus pesticides (OPs) in water and the method was compared with a conventional solid phase extraction (SPE) technique. The extracted OPs were analyzed by gas chromatography using thermionic specific detection. Both extraction methods presented linear calibration at least over the concentration range investigated (100 to 1000 ng x mL(-1) for SPE and 1 to 100 ng x mL(-1) for SPME). SPME method presented higher sensitivity than SPE. The quantitation limits were between 0.1 to 1.0 ng x mL(-1) for SPME depending upon the analyte, and 100 ng x mL(-1) for SPE. The precision, as measured by the standard deviations (RSD), were in the range 3.6% to 5.8% for SPME and 2.4% to 9.2% for SPE. Along with the feature of being a solvent - free sampling technique, SPME offers additional benefits due to its high sensitivity, simplicity, and small size sample required (typically: SPE - 500 mL, SPME - 5 mL).     

Comments on the NAS Report: Odors From Stationary and Mobile Sources

ABSTRACT

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) presents many advantages over conventional analytical methods by combining sampling, preconcentration, and direct transfer of the analytes into a standard gas chromatograph (GC). Since its commercial introduction in the early 1990s, SPME has been successfully applied to the sampling and analysis of environmental samples. This paper presents an overview of the current methods for air sampling and analysis with SPME using both grab and time-weighted average (TWA) modes. Methods include total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), formaldehyde, and several target volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Field sampling data obtained with these methods in indoor air were validated with conventional methods based on sorbent tubes. The advantages and challenges associated with SPME for air sampling are also discussed. SPME is accurate, fast, sensitive, versatile, and cost-efficient, and could serve as a powerful alternative to conventional methods used by the research, industrial, regulatory, and academic communities.     

COMPARISON BETWEEN SOLID–PHASE EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE CHROMATOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDES IN WATER

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) procedure has been developed to ex tract eight organophosphorus pesticides (OPs) in water and the method was compared with a conventional solid phase extraction (SPE) technique. The extracted OPs were analyzed by gas chromatography using thermionic specific detection. Both extraction methods presented linear calibration at least over the concentration range investigated (100 to 1000 ng.mL^?1 for SPE and 1 to 100 ng.mL^?1 for SPME). SPME method presented higher sensitivity than SPE. The quantitation limits were between 0.1 to 1.0 ng.mL^?1 for SPME depending upon the analyte, and 100 ng.mL^?1 for SPE. The precision, as measured by the standard deviations (RSD), were in the range 3.6 % to 5.8 % for SPME and 2.4 % to 9.2 % for SPE.

Along with the feature of being a solvent – free sampling technique, SPME offers additional benefits due to its high sensitivity, simplicity, and small size sample required (typically: SPE – 500 mL, SPME – 5 mL).     

Development of a simple, accurate SPME-based method for assay of VOCs in column breakthrough experiments

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with gas chromatography is to be used for assay of effluent liquid samples from soil column experiments associated with VOC fate/transport studies. One goal of the fate/transport studies is to develop accurate, highly reproducible column breakthrough curves for 1,2-cis-dichloroethylene (cis-DCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) to better understand interactions with selected natural solid phases. For SPME, the influences of the sample equilibration time, extraction temperature and the ratio of volume of sample bottle to that of the liquid sample (V(T)/V(w)) are the critical factors that could influence accuracy and precision of the measured results. Equilibrium between the gas phase and liquid phase was attained after 200 min of equilibration time. The temperature must be carefully controlled due to variation of both the Henry's constant (K(h)) and the fibre/gas phase distribution coefficient (K(fg)). K(h) decreases with decreasing temperature while K(fg) increases. Low V(T)/V(w) yields better sensitivity but results in analyte losses and negative bias of the resultant assay. High V(T)/V(w) ratio yields reduced sensitivity but analyte losses were found to be minimal, leading to better accuracy and reproducibility. A fast SPME method was achieved, 5 min for SPME extraction and 3.10 min for GC analysis. A linear calibration function in the gas phase was developed to analyse the breakthrough curve data, linear between a range of 0.9-236 microgl(-1), and a detection limit lower than 5 microgl(-1).     

Analysis of acidic pesticides using in situ derivatization with alkylchloroformate and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for GC-MS.

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method was developed for the analysis of acidic pesticide residues in water. The method utilizes in situ derivatization with butylchloroformate (BuCF), followed by on-line SPME extraction using a PDMS fibre, and analysis by GC-MS. Derivatives of the phenoxy acids mechlorprop (MCPP), dichlorprop (DCPP), MCPA and 2,4-D and their phenol degradation products 4-chloro-2-methylphenol and 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) were identified. Detection limits at 0.16-2.3 microg/l were achieved. Optimization of derivatization, ion strength, extraction time, SPME-fibre, desorption time and temperature are described. Standard curves in the range 0.5-10.0 microg/l were fitted to a second-degree polynomial. Standard deviation (n = 5) was below 10% for the phenol derivatives, but 20-50% for the phenoxy acids. For method verification groundwater samples from a field experiment were screened for content of MCPP and compared to the results from the HPLC analysis. A good agreement was obtained with respect to identification of positive samples, even though concentrations measured by the SPME were lower than with HPLC. Even if the precision and accuracy do not meet the demands for a strictly quantitative analysis, the SPME method is suitable for screening, because it is cheap, it can be automated, and uses smaller amounts of potential harmful solvents. Also, the method is less labour-intensive, as it requires a minimum of sample preparation when compared to traditional analyses. The acidic pesticides bentazon, dicamba, bromoxynil, ioxynil, dinoseb and DNOC were included in the study but could not be analysed by the current method.     

Matrix effect on the performance of headspace solid phase microextraction method for the analysis of target volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in environmental samples

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) is a fast, cheap and solvent free methodology widely used for environmental analysis. A SPME methodology has been optimized for the analysis of VOCs in a range of matrices covering different soils of varying textures, organic matrices from manures and composts from different origins, and biochars. The performance of the technique was compared for the different matrices spiked with a multicomponent VOC mixture, selected to cover different VOC groups of environmental relevance (ketone, terpene, alcohol, aliphatic hydrocarbons and alkylbenzenes). VOC recovery was dependent on the nature itself of the VOC and the matrix characteristics. The SPME analysis of non-polar compounds, such as alkylbenzenes, terpenes and aliphatic hydrocarbons, was markedly affected by the type of matrix as a consequence of the competition for the adsorption sites in the SPME fiber. These non-polar compounds were strongly retained in the biochar surfaces limiting the use of SPME for this type of matrices. However, this adsorption capacity was not evident when biochar had undergone a weathering/aging process through composting. Polar compounds (alcohol and ketone) showed a similar behavior in all matrices, as a consequence of the hydrophilic characteristics, affected by water content in the matrix. SPME showed a good performance for soils and organic matrices especially for non-polar compounds, achieving a limit of detection (LD) and limit of quantification (LQ) of 0.02 and 0.03 ng g⁻¹ for non-polar compounds and poor extraction for more hydrophilic and polar compounds (LD and LQ higher 310 and 490 ng g⁻¹). The characteristics of the matrix, especially pH and organic matter, had a marked impact on SPME, due to the competition of the analytes for active sites in the fiber, but VOC biodegradation should not be discarded in matrices with active microbial biomass.