关于核燃料循环建设项目竣工环境保护验收监测的思考

针对核燃料循环建设项目竣工环境保护验收监测活动中存在的问题作探讨,明确了验收监测活动的起点,建议加强验收监测方案编制的培训。指出应重视流出物的持续监测和环保设施运行效率的验证,验收监测方案应参考环评文件中的环境监测计划,结合设施运行后的现状合理编制,并重视与污染源项有关的其他监测问题。提出了进一步完善核燃料循环标准体系、持续加强环保验收能力建设等建议。     

通过建设项目环保验收监测对环评工作的建议

环评报告是建设项目开展环保验收工作的重要依据。环保验收工作中必须对照环评报告的内容及要求进行调查和监测。由于环评报告中工程内容、环保措施、评价因子等内容不够完善,使得工程建设中措施无法完全落实,造成环保验收工作不能顺利进行。本文通过对环保验收监测中遇到的实例进行分析,为更好的开展环评及验收监测工作提供建议。     

建设项目竣工环境保护验收监测

阐述了建设项目竣工环境保护验收监测的依据、原则、内容和监测程序，提出了验收监测中应注意的问题．     

建设项目环境影响评价现状监测应注意的若干问题

建设项目环境影响评价现状监测是环境影响评价的基础，环评结论是否可信，在很大程度上取决于环境现状监测的代表性、公正性和准确性。结合工作经验，本文提出当前环评现状监测时应注意的几个问题。     

建设项目竣工验收监测难点问题解析

分析了建设项目竣工环境保护验收监测工作中存在的审核、环评批复、复测管理、建设单位配合、监测技术和监测管理等问题及原因,提出了加强相关法律法规学习宣传、建立完善验收监测制度与程序、强化质量控制管理等解决办法及建议.     

环保设施建设中存在的问题与对策

阐述了环保设施建设中存在的问题，指出污染防治措施缺乏针对性，环保设施建设程序不规范，竣工验收监测把关不严，日常管理不完善，提出应提高环评人员的业务水平，规范环保设施建设程序，严把验收监测关，加强环保设施的日常管理。     

基于环保竣工验收对建设项目环评的思考

结合建设项目环境保护竣工验收实际案例,指出了在依据环评文件进行环保竣工验收经常遇到的问题。提出环境影响评价单位应基于经济技术可行性、实际可操作性提出环保措施,合理识别预测污染因子等反馈意见;环保审批部门应在环评单位与环保验收单位之间建立起交流、沟通的渠道,以更好地把好环评审批和环保验收审批两个关。     

水泥工业项目竣工环保验收监测中应关注的问题

根据建设项目竣工环境保护验收规范要求,结合工作实践,从验收监测工况的控制、废水监测、废气监测、噪声监测、环境质量监测几方面归纳了水泥工业项目竣工环境保护验收监测工作中应注意的技术问题,并从环保法律法规制度执行、污染防治设施、企业环境管理、排污口规范化、卫生防护距离、总量控制、淘汰落后设备、公众参与等几方面提出环境保护检...     

火电厂“废水处理回用工程”竣工验收监测应注意的几个问题

结合火电厂“废水处理回用工程”的工艺流程，提出了验收标准，监测点位以及监测因子选择应注意的问题．     

煤电项目竣工环保验收监测二氧化硫排放总量问题浅探

将29个煤电项目验收监测核算的二氧化硫排放总量与环保行政主管部门批复的总量控制指标作对比,从运行负荷、脱硫效率、燃煤煤质等方面分析了二者数值存在较大差异的原因。建议在验收监测期间要求企业按环评设计值控制各项参数,并将验收监测总量核算结果作为排污许可或日常监管的参照,进一步强化总量核查与总量控制,推行排污许可证制度。     

石油炼制项目竣工环保验收监测检查常见问题

根据建设项目竣工环境保护验收监测相关标准规范要求和实践经验,总结了石油炼制项目竣工环境保护验收监测实践工作中的若干常见问题。根据石油炼制项目污染物来源和特点,分析了加热炉废气监测、恶臭VOCs治理、含油污水监测、防渗措施和地下水监测以及污水处理"三泥"(含油污泥、气浮浮渣、剩余的废活性污泥)和碱渣处置等常见重点难点问题,在此基础上提出了一些对策和建议,为今后开展验收监测检查工作提供借鉴。     

Evaluating the performance and procedural effectiveness of Namibia's Environmental Impact Assessment system

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Namibia was formally introduced in 2007. However, little EIA related research has been undertaken and the system has not been formally reviewed. This paper evaluates the performance and effectiveness of the EIA system in Namibia. The criteria used for the evaluation were obtained from several sources in the literature and based on legal, administrative, and procedural frameworks. Data were collected through literature review, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews. The study revealed that Namibia has a functional EIA system based on fairly good legislation, institutional arrangements and a well outlined EIA process. Analysis of the legislation and administrative frameworks nevertheless highlighted several weaknesses including a lack of coherence in the legislation and poor implementation. Further weaknesses included a lack of monitoring and enforcement capacity, weak communication and information sharing, inadequate financial and human resources, and inappropriate public consultation approaches. It was found that EIA is slowly being accepted in Namibia and it has a preventative effect on proposed developments. The study recommends an urgent need to complete the ongoing legislative reform to close existing gaps and to improve the performance of the EIA system.     

建设项目环境影响回顾性评价实例

结合“三同时”项目竣工验收监测，对建设项目进行环境影响回顾性评价。回顾性评价内容包括：调查、核实项目建设的规模、内容以及污染物的治理设施；对应环评本底进行环境质量验证性监测；根据污染物达标排放监测结果，进行环保十持施有效性分析；清洁生产、循环经济执行情况；总量控制、环境管理体系的落实情况；以及公众调查、结论与建议等。     

Public participation modes in China's environmental impact assessment process: An analytical framework based on participation extent and conflict level

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) serves as a gatekeeper to prevent environmental pollution, and public participation is a legal requirement in the EIA process that ensures people's awareness of activities that may jeopardize the environment. Recently, with the elevated awareness of environmental protection and increasing environmental sensitivity, EIA has evolved as a means for the public to show their attitudes towards environmental issues. More frequently, public protests against not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) facilities have become a significant challenge in the government's decision-making process. Government officials and EIA practitioners continue to look for a more effective way of public participation and aim to establish a platform that can involve related stakeholders. However, current research on public participation is limited to individual case studies or lacks a systematic approach to analysing diversified modes of public participation, which may differentiate levels of acceptance by the government in the EIA process and consequently lead to different effects. Therefore, from the perspectives of the participation extent and conflict level, this paper aims to establish an integrated framework to categorize different public participation patterns in EIA practices and to analyse their characteristics, such as preferences and the action logic arising from different stakeholders, including the government and public. The paper concludes that collaborative public participation is a possible way to strengthen the effectiveness of public involvement within the Chinese context.     

Is EIA part of the wind power planning problem?

This research evaluates the importance and effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) within wind farm planning debates, drawing on insights from case studies in Scotland. Despite general public support for renewable energy on the grounds that it is needed to tackle climate change and implement sustainable development, many proposed wind farms encounter significant resistance. The importance of planning issues and (EIA) processes has arguably been overlooked within recent wind farm social acceptability discourse. Through semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and textual analysis of EIA documents, the characteristics of EIA are assessed in terms of its perceived purpose and performance. The data show that whilst respondents perceive EIA to be important, they express concerns about bias and about the inability of EIA to address climate change and wind farm decommissioning issues adequately. Furthermore, the research identifies key issues which impede the effectiveness of EIA, and reveals differences between theoretical and practical framings of EIA. The paper questions the assumption that EIA is a universally applicable tool, and argues that its effectiveness should be analysed in the context of specific development sectors. The article concludes by reviewing whether the recently amended EIA Directive (2014/52/EU) could resolve identified problems within national EIA practice.