快速溶剂萃取-SPE硅胶柱净化-高效液相色谱法测定土壤中多环芳烃16种化合物的研究

综合比较不同土壤前处理和分析测试方法,建立了快速溶剂萃取-SPE硅胶柱净化-高效液相色谱测定土壤中PAHs16种化合物的方法,并对各步骤进行了条件优化。方法检出限在0.77ug/kg～15.4ug/kg之间,基质加标回收率在63.0%～116%之间,测定结果的相对标准偏差在2.23%～17.0%之间,符合美国EPA标准,是一种安全、低毒的分析方法。土壤标准参考物测定结果表明:该方法分离效果良好,能够满足土壤分析测试要求。本方法也适用于农产品中PAHs16的检测。     

土壤和河流沉积物中六六六和滴滴涕残留的测定

采用密闭微波提取、超声波提取、索氏提取对土壤和河流沉积物进行前处理,提取液经弗罗里硅土柱净化或浓硫酸净化.通过回收率实验和精密度实验对三种提取方法和两种净化方法进行比较,建立了微波提取土壤和河流沉积物中六六六和滴滴涕,浓硫酸净化,气相色谱一质谱测定的分析方法,方法回收率在84%～110%之间,精密度(RSD)在2.8%～9.9%之间.采用该方法对阜阳市废弃农药厂周围的土壤和河流沉积物中六六六和滴滴涕进行了监测.     

柱后衍生离子色谱法测定土壤和沉积物中的六价铬

采用加热回流提取、柱后衍生离子色谱法分离土壤和沉积物中的六价铬，使用紫外可见检测器进行测定。选用7种土壤和沉积物的实际样品，依次讨论了氢氧化钠-碳酸钠溶液、碳酸氢钠溶液、氢氧化钠-氯化钾溶液、离子色谱碱性淋洗液4种不同提取剂对六价铬的提取效率，以及超声提取、水浴振荡提取和恒温磁力搅拌冷凝回流3种提取方式的提取效果；研究了10～60 min、25～190℃条件下的最佳提取时间和加热温度；分析了不同提取剂体积和称样量比值条件下六价铬标土的测定量，并探究了提取液的保存条件。优化后的前处理条件：称取2.5 g筛分后的土壤或沉积物样品，加入25 mL NaOH/Na₂CO₃提取剂，在恒温磁力搅拌冷凝回流装置上于120℃加热回流60 min,离心后用0.22μm滤膜过滤，用柱后衍生离子色谱紫外检测装置进行测定。相比目前常用的分光光度法、原子吸收法等测定土壤中六价铬方法，柱后衍生离子色谱法特异性强，降低了差减法或其他前处理技术测定六价铬时所引入的误差，且不受提取液色度、浊度等影响。方法检出限可达0.002 mg/kg,灵敏度高，操作简便，抗干扰能力强，对于...     

高效液相色谱法测定土壤中阿维菌素残留

采用高效液相色谱法紫外检测器测定土壤中的阿维菌素残留,选择丙酮为提取剂、二氯甲烷为萃取剂,优化了色谱条件.方法在0 mg/L～12.1 mg/L范围内线性良好,检出限为0.014 mg/kg,空白土壤加标样品平行测定的RSD≤6.5%,回收率为78.6%～83.1%,残留试验表明阿维菌素在土壤中消解速率较快.     

土壤中20种磺酰脲类除草剂的超高效液相色谱-串联质谱测定方法

建立了加速溶剂提取、凝胶渗透色谱法净化-超高效液相色谱/串联质谱快速测定土壤中20种磺酰脲类除草剂的方法。土壤经过冷冻干燥、粉碎过筛,用加速溶剂仪提取(ASE),经凝胶渗透色谱净化(GPC),以超高效液相色谱/串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)多级监测模式(MRM)外标法进行定性定量分析。结果表明:土壤中20种磺酰脲类除藻剂的检出限为2～5 ng/kg。对同一环境样品进行了3个不同添加量(1、5、10μg/L)的加标回收实验,平均回收率为65. 7%～106. 1%,相对标准偏差为2. 3%～12. 1%。该方法快速、灵敏、准确,可有效应用于土壤中20种磺酰脲类除草剂的快速监测。     

高效液相色谱法测定柑橘及橘园土壤中乙撑硫脲残留

建立了高效液相色谱测定柑橘及橘园土壤中乙撑硫脲残留的方法,优化了试验条件.方法在0 mg/L～5.35 mg/L范围内线性良好,橘园土壤、橘皮、橘肉样品的检出限(以鲜重计)分别为0.006 mg/kg、0.008 mg/kg、0.006 mg/kg,样品测定的RSD≤5.1%,加标回收率为82.9%～92.8%.     

水溶剂加速萃取-超高效液相色谱串联质谱测定土壤中全氟羧酸

采用水溶剂加速萃取-超高效液相色谱串联质谱法（UPLC-MS/MS）建立了土壤中6种全氟羧酸（PFCs）的分析方法,并对色谱分析条件、水溶剂萃取条件、固相萃取柱净化条件及实验材料选择等进行了优化。结果表明,以ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18色谱柱为分离柱,2.0 mmol/L乙酸铵水溶液为流动相A,甲醇为流动相B,梯度洗脱下可在9 min内完成6种PFCs的测试,检出限为0.03~0.4 μg/kg。对实际土壤样品进行测定,加标回收率为90.7%~118%,相对标准偏差为5.6%~18.0%,精密度和准确度均较好。该方法前处理过程简单、易操作,仪器检测效率高、结果准确,能够满足土壤中PFCs的检测要求。     

ASE萃取-SPE净化- HPLC法测定土壤中多环芳烃

建立了加速溶剂萃取-固相萃取净化-高效液相色谱测定土壤中16种多环芳烃的方法,优化了试验条件.方法线性关系良好,16种多环芳烃的检出限在0.412 ng/g～3.974 ng/g之间,空白加标试验的相对标准偏差在1.2%～12.7%之间,基质加标回收率在60.4%～126%之间.实际样品的测定结果表明该方法分离效果好,能够满足土壤分析的要求.     

优化QuEChERS结合HPLC测定沉积物中14种多环芳烃

以美国国家标准技术研究院(NIST)2种沉积物标样SRM 1944和SRM 1941b为研究对象,建立并优化了QuEChERS结合HPLC测定沉积物中14种多环芳烃的前处理方法,并与传统索氏提取进行比较。优化后的QuEChERS方法:样品经乙腈浸泡后,超声15 min,漩涡振荡3 min,以NaCl和无水MgSO_4盐析,提取液经PSA净化后经HPLC-FLD测定。该条件下14种PAHs的方法检出限为0.5~5.0μg/kg,SRM 1944和SRM 1941b中PAHs回收率分别为73.4%~104.9%和71.9%~96.4%,相对标准偏差分别为0.47%~3.45%和0.87%~3.05%。索氏提取SRM 1944与1941b回收率分别为78.9%~109.3%和80.9%~108.2%,相对标准偏差分别为1.46%~10.3%和1.27%~10.8%。优化后的QuEChERS回收率与索氏提取较为接近,但具有更高的精密度。将该方法用于实际海洋沉积物提取,PAHs测定值与索氏提取较为接近。优化后的QuEChERS方法满足批量沉积物样品中PAHs的快速测定要求。     

QuEChERS/GC-MS法快速测定城市污泥中4种多环芳烃

建立了快速、简便测定城市污泥中4种主要PAHs污染物(菲、荧蒽、芘、苯并[α]芘)含量的检测方法。利用Qu ECh ERS提取方法,样品经乙腈并以超声波辅助提取,提取液过0.22μm滤膜后,采用气相色谱-质谱法对4种物质进行测定。对QuEChERS萃取条件及超声时间进行了优化,确立最优试验条件,比较建立的萃取方法与传统索氏提取方法对加标样品中4种PAHs的萃取效率。结果表明,4种PAHs得到较好的分离效果,方法检出限为0.27~0.49μg/kg,相对标准偏差为2.8%~8.6%(n=7),加标回收率为81.9%~116.3%,对菲、荧蒽、芘、苯并[α]芘提取效率与索氏萃取方法相当。运用该方法对西安某污水处理厂的原污泥和堆肥处理后污泥进行检测,4种分析物均有检出。该方法具有操作简便、灵敏、环保等特点,适用于城市污泥中菲、荧蒽、芘、苯并[α]芘的定性定量分析。     

Development and application of microwave assisted extraction (MAE) for the extraction of five polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediment samples in Johannesburg area, South Africa

A microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) method was verified and applied for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment samples. Soxhlet extraction was used as the reference method. The optimum MAE was carried out with 20 mL of hexane/acetone (1:1, v/v) mixture in a 1-g sample at 250 W for 20 min. Soxhlet extraction was carried out with 250 mL of dichloromethane:hexane (1:1, v/v) mixture in a 15-g sample for 24 h in a water bath maintained at 60 °C. The collected extracts were both cleaned up, reduced to 1 mL under nitrogen and then injected into an HPLC fluorescence. To increase the sample throughput, simultaneous MAE was performed. The obtained percentage recoveries ranged from 61 to 93 and 88–98 for MAE and SE, respectively. The optimised MAE method was validated using certified reference material. It was then applied to real sediment samples from in and around the greater Johannesburg area. The sediments from Jukskei River were found to be the most polluted while Hartbeespoort Dam sediments were found to be least polluted. The overall order of concentrations for the studied PAHs per site was as follows: Jukskei River?>?Kempton Park?>?Centurion Dams?>?Natalspruit River (PIT)?>?Hartbeespoort Dam.     

Determination of organophosphorus fire retardants and plasticizers in wastewater samples using MAE-SPME with GC-ICPMS and GC-TOFMS detection

Determination of organophosphorus fire retardants and plasticizers at trace levels in wastewater is described. In this work, microwave assisted extraction (MAE) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) are used for sample preparation to extract and preconcentrate the analytes, followed by analysis by gas chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (GC-ICP-MS) for phosphorus-specific detection. Gas chromatography coupled to time of flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS) was used to confirm the organphosphorus fire retardants in wastewater. The detection limits of organophosphorus fire retardants (OPFRs) were 29 ng L(-1) for tri-n-butyl phosphate (TnBP), 45 ng for L(-1) for tris(2-butoxyethyl)phosphate (TBEP), and 50 ng L(-1) for tris(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate (TEHP). Optimized extraction conditions were performed at 65 degrees C for 30 min and with 10% NaCl. Application of MAE during the sample preparation prior to the SPME allowed the detection of tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate, which has been difficult to determine in previous work. Application of the method to wastewater samples resulted in detecting 3.1 microg L(-1) P from TnBP, 5.0 microg L(-1) P from TBEP, and 4.0 microg L(-1) P from TEHP. The presence of these compounds were also confirmed by SPME-GC-TOF-MS.     

常州市秋季大气PM2.5中多环芳烃污染水平及来源

为了研究常州市秋季大气PM2.5中多环芳烃的污染水平及其来源,在常州市布设了6个采样点,分别代表交通干道区、商业混合区、居民文教区、远郊区、工业区和对照点,于2013年10月进行大气PM2.5的采样,采用微波萃取-高效液相色谱法测定其中16种USEPA优控多环芳烃的浓度值,并分别通过比值法和因子分析法判断其主要来源。结果表明,常州市秋季大气PM2.5中多环芳烃的主要来源为煤燃烧和机动车排放。     

Microwave-Assisted Solvent Extraction of Air Particulates for the Determination of PAHs

A method for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in air particulates using microwave-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) coupled to a microwave extraction system (MES) is proposed. During the period of August to October, 1994, Singapore was enveloped by haze caused by forest fires in Sumatra, Indonesia. Air sampling were carried out during September and October; the determination of ambient air PAH levels in Singapore was undertaken. PAH analysis by GC-MS provided excellent sensitivity, linearity of quantitation, peak identification. This technique was evaluated using certified reference materials (CRMs) HS-4 and HS-6. Good recoveries of PAHs (>73.3%) were obtained for both CRMs. The MASE technique using MES is suitable for the determination of PAH levels in ambient air with no clean-up step required.     

微波萃取技术在分析土壤中有机污染物的应用

介绍了微波萃取技术及其使用的试剂、设备和条件,对微波萃取在分析土壤中有机污染物的应用予以综述,阐述了微波萃取技术是分析土壤中有机污染物的好方法。     

微波辅助萃取技术及其在环境分析中的应用

微波辅助萃取技术是近年来发展较快的一种新型萃取方法,与传统的提取方式相比,具有省时、节能、简易、高效等优点.文章介绍了微波辅助萃取技术的特点和影响因素,综述了近年来其在环境分析中的应用情况.     

气相色谱-质谱法测定废酸油渣中的16种多环芳烃

建立了废酸油渣中16种多环芳烃超声萃取、Florisil萃取柱净化、气相色谱-质谱测定的方法。笔者对提取方式、提取剂类型和体积、提取时间和次数、净化方式等进行研究,采用无水硫酸钠分散,二氯甲烷作为提取剂超声40 min,提取液经纯水清洗、离心后取适量有机相经过3 g Florisil萃取柱净化,采用气相色谱-质谱选择离子模式(SIM),加入内标进行定量分析。结果表明:二氯甲烷提取效率比正己烷好,丙酮可能引起酸性样品中多环芳烃的降解,丙酮超声萃取时加入无水硫酸钠能在一定程度上防止目标物降解,但萃取效率不可控制,宜采用二氯甲烷作为萃取剂。分散提取能有效减少提取时间,超声清洗仪超声40 min提取效率为86.2%～104%。3g Florisil萃取柱净化比1 g Florisil萃取柱净化和GPC净化效果略好。方法检出限为0.4～1.3 mg/kg,6次空白加标的相对标准偏差为2.3%～15.3%,6个实际样品测定结果的相对标准偏差为1.2%～27.3%,基体加标回收率为51.3%～126%,连续校准稳定。该方法适用于废酸油渣样品中16种多环芳烃的检测,比直接溶解有效,比加速溶剂萃取、索氏提取、微波萃取和超声探头萃取简单、快捷,能有效减少设备污染和腐蚀,净化方法有效,测定结果准确可靠,是实现大批量样品检测的可行方法。     

Supercritical fluid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from white pine (Pinus strobus) needles and its implications

A supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) method was developed for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from fresh and fallen pine needles. Toluene-modified CO2 was used as the extracting fluid, and the extracted PAHs were analyzed by GC-MS. Using a two-stage extraction procedure, a static extraction at 180 degrees C and a dynamic extraction at 60 degrees C, and an in-cell silica gel plug plus a post-oven silica gel column, the extraction and fractionation of PAHs can be accomplished in one step. Over a seven month period, a significant variation was observed for PAHs in urban samples, while PAHs in mountain samples were at much lower levels (by a factor of approximately 8) and showed little seasonal change. Although dry fallen needles and fresh needles contained similar amounts of PAHs, in the fallen needles the lower molecular weight PAHs were partially lost while the higher molecular weight PAHs were slightly enriched. Pollution in urban areas was found to be highly localized, and buildings and trees are believed to be important factors in the restriction of atmospheric PAHs.     

Comparison of pressurized fluid extraction, Soxhlet extraction and sonication for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban air and diesel exhaust particulate matter

In order to characterize and compare the chemical composition of diesel particulate matter and ambient air samples collected on filters, different extraction procedures were tested and their extraction efficiencies and recoveries determined. This study is an evaluation of extraction methods using the standard 16 EPA PAHs with HPLC fluorescence analysis. Including LC analysis also GC and MS methods for the determination of PAHs can be used. Soxhlet extraction was compared with ultrasonic agitation and pressurized fluid extraction (PFE) using three solvents to extract PAHs from diesel exhaust and urban air particulates. The selected PAH compounds of soluble organic fractions were analyzed by HPLC with a multiple wavelength shift fluorescence detector. The EPA standard mixture of 16 PAH compounds was used as a standard to identify and quantify diesel exhaust-derived PAHs. The most effective extraction method of those tested was pressurized fluid extraction using dichloromethane as a solvent.     

Preliminary studies of a fast screening method for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil by using solvent microextraction-gas chromatography

Solvent microextraction (SME) was applied to the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from spiked and real environmental soil samples with different matrices. Soil sample was mixed with 7 mL of acetone and 14 mL of water to allow partitioning of the PAHs from the soil to the liquid phase. A 2 microL octane drop suspended from a microsyringe needle tip was then immersed into the stirred solution-soil mixture for extraction. After an 11 min extraction, the octane drop was withdrawn into the syringe and injected directly into the GC for identification and quantification. The whole analysis procedure took 27 min, with an extraction time of 11 min, and a GC separation time of 16 min. A second extraction could be undertaken whilst the GC is running, hence the GC run time currently limits the sample throughput. In this method, a small amount of organic solvent was used for the extraction process, which produced little waste. The limits of detection for lower molecular weight (< 230) PAHs range from 0.13 to 0.36 mg kg-1, and for higher molecular weight (> 250) PAHs are estimated to be between 0.5 and 1.0 mg kg-1, with RSD values generally under 20%. Due to the small volumes of organic solvent used, the consumable cost per extraction is only US$ 0.12. This is the first report of the application of SME to solid samples, and the first report of the use of SME for the analysis of PAHs.