辽宁省可持续发展指标体系和评价方法研究

阐述了可持续发展指标体系的概念及国内外可持续发展指标体系的研究状况，详细介绍了辽宁省建立可持续发展指标体系应遵循的原则，并提出了指标综合评价法，为实现区域可持续发展提供了技术依据。     

可持续发展指标体系初探

可持续发展指标体系的设置原则、构成框架，对评价经济与环境可持续发展有着一定的实践意义，通过指标含义的界定，对各类指标进行描述。     

烟台市城市可持续发展评价

本文根据城市系统的结构和可持续发展指标体系的建立原则,建立烟台市城市可持续发展评价指标体系。在运用层次分析法计算指标权重和结合指标分数计算可持续发展度的基础上分析烟台市城市可持续发展的能力,并提出相应的建议与对策。     

建立上海可持续发展指标体系的研究

在可持续发展理论研究中，提出建立多目标的指标体系是实施可持续发展战略的重要环节，阐述了建立上海可持续发展指标体系的５项基本原则是系统性、层次性、主要性、可比性、操作性。据此设计了包括４个领域６０个指标组成的指标体系框架。阐明了从原计划指标体系滚动式过渡到可持续发展指标体系；从第１０个五年计划开始，３个五年计划分３步建立并完善指标体系与国际接轨和建立综合评价指数来表征可持续发展状况等实施可持续发展指     

区域可持续发展评价方法与实例研究

１评价指标体系的建立依据科学性、可操作性、相关性、简明性原则，综合采用频率统计法、理论分析法和专家咨询法，并考虑所研究区域———青岛市崂山区的自然环境和社会经济发展状况，建立了区域可持续发展评价指标体系，见表１。２评价指标权重的确定通过专家咨询，采用群组层次分析法，求出各评价指标的权重，见表１。表１区域可持续发展评价指标体系与权重３　评价方法的选取３－１　无量纲化处理模型采用直线型模糊隶属函数，对评价指标值进行无量化处理。根据统计指标的性质及表现不同，主要有下列３种类型：（１）正指标类，其模糊隶…     

新疆生态环境质量评价指标体系研究

 建立省区一级生态环境质量评价指标体系，在我国具有十分重要的理论和实践意义根据代表性、综合性、系统性、易获性原则，在具体指标设置上注意景观生态格局和生态功能的统一，水的主导因子作用，现行统计指标的选用，山地的特殊功能等，采用常用的综合指数法，以新疆87个县（市）为评价单元，建立了简易合理、具可操作性的新疆生态环境质量评价指标体系，并确定了各指标的权值和相对的分级标准，为新疆生态环境现状的准确评价提供了可靠依据，对新疆社会经济的可持续发展和生态环境管理将起到积极作用．     

可持续发展实验区建设期评价指标体系的建立

评价指标体系是可持续发展实验区建设的重中之重。本文以南宁市沙井分区为例,以低碳为特色,探讨了可持续发展实验区建设期评价指标体系建立的指导思想和基本原则,构建了"目的—理论—政策—反映"评价指标体系框架,并通过对评价系统进行分类,采用频度分析法和改进的德尔菲法筛选指标,建立了一套主客观相结合、五类四层次的可持续发展实验区建设期评价指标体系,同时提出了落实指标体系的保障措施。该研究对指导我国可持续发展实验区建设具有重要的意义。     

番禺区可持续发展评价研究

通过建立番禺区可持续发展评价指标体系，运用主成分分析和独立性分析方法筛选出评价指标，采用层次分析法（AHP)确定各项指标的权重，进行可持续发展评价。评价表明番禺区届平稳型可持续发展。     

重庆高新区可持续发展水平评价与对策研究

提出了建立重庆高新区可持续发展评价指标体系的6项基本原则，从经济高效、社会文明、环境舒适（ESE）3方面设计了包括3个高层指标、8个中层指标、45个单项指标的指标体系。采用特尔斐法、层次分析法和线性加权法，对评价指数进行了量化计算和整合，据此评价重庆高新区的可持续发展水平，并对照发展性质相似的苏州高新区、深圳高新区，指出重庆高新区在发展中存在的问题，并提出可持续发展的若干对策。     

浅论区域开发环境影响评价的指标体系

论述了在区域可持续发展原则下区域开发环境影响评价指标体系的特点、构成范围、指标设置和选择的原则。     

基于可持续性的城市总体规划环境影响评价指标体系

城市总体规划（简称“总规”）是实施城市可持续性战略的重要载体,战略环境评价（SEA）是连接抽象的、宏观的可持续发展战略与具体的、可操作的建设项目之间的桥梁,是实施可持续发展战略的政策工具;指标体系是SEA工作的核心工作和评价依据。然而,当前存在城市总体规划环境影响评价（总规环评）指标体系与城市规划内容、城市可持续性脱节,指标体系的设计缺乏理论支撑等问题。本文首先归纳出城市可持续性的一般内涵,然后通过逻辑关系分析、影响评价矩阵的方法,识别总规的可持续性影响,构建了可持续性总规环评指标体系框架,最后以太仓为案例说明框架的应用。     

西安市可持续发展能力环境影响评价指标体系实证

文章分析了目前我国城市可持续发展能力环境影响评价指标体系的研究现状和存在的问题。在传统的城市宏观经济运行过程模型的基础上,提出了PESER系统城市可持续发展能力环境影响评价经济运行模型。在此基础上,将城市可持续发展能力环境影响评价的描述性指标与货币化量值指标进行有机结合,构建了西安市可持续发展能力环境影响评价指标体系。     

交通规划环境影响评价的指标体系探讨

基于可持续发展的要求与环境管理的发展趋势，分析了制订交通规划环境影响评价的指标体系的原理，探讨了建立交通规划环境影响评价指标体系的基本框架和技术方法；以中国大中型城市为背景，建立了交通规划环境影响评价的DP-SIR可选指标集。     

可持续发展评价指标体系研究综述

可持续发展是当今世界关注的焦点问题之一。作为实施可持续发展战略重要工具的可持续发展评价指标体系是当前可持续性科学的研究热点。在阐明了可持续发展评价指标体系建立的一般过程与方法的基础上,综述了国内外可持续发展评价指标体系的研究现状,指出以下几个方面有望成为今后可持续发展评价指标体系研究的发展方向:可持续性科学内涵和外延的拓展研究;可持续发展评价指标体系的规范分析研究;减少人为主观因素对综合指数的影响研究;探讨评估综合指数可应用性、透明度和测度准确性的一般方法;可持续发展评价指标体系的应用研究。     

Dynamic analysis and assessment for sustainable development

The assessment of sustainable development is crucial for constituting sustainable development strategies.Assessment methods that exist so far usually only use an indicator system for making sustainable judgement.These indicators rarely reflect dynamic characteristics.However,sustainable development is influenced by changes in the social-economic system and in the eco-environmental system at different times.Besides the spatial character,sustainable development has a temporal character that can not be neglected;therefore the research system should also be dynamic.This paper focuses on this dynamic trait,so that the assessment results obtained provide more information for judgements in decision-making processes.Firstly the dynamic characteristics of sustainable development are analyzed,which point to a track of sustainable development that is an upward undulating curve.According to the dynamic character and the development rules of a social,economic and ecological system,a flexible assessment approach that is based on tendency analysis,restrictive conditions and a feedback system is then proposed for sustainable development.     

旅游规划环境影响评价研究

随着旅游业的发展,在满足国内外日益提高的旅游需求的同时,造成旅游区生态环境与人文遗产不同程度的破坏,出现旅游资源退化现象,人们越来越意识到保护旅游资源和旅游环境的重要性。通过分析旅游规划环境影响评价的研究意义,探讨旅游规划环境影响评价的原则、内容、指标体系及其程序,并提出了开展旅游规划环境影响评价的整体方案,为今后的旅游规划环境影响评价奠定基础,为旅游事业可持续发展提供科学依据。     

支持系统理论下的云南省区域可持续发展初步研究

可持续发展指标的筛选和指标体系的构建是可持续发展理论的一部分。在可持续发展系统的支持系统理论下，结合云南的区域特点：构建了可持续发展5个支持系统下的指标体系，每个支持系统选取3个指标，指标数据经相应的数学计算，从而得出云南省16个地、州、市可持续发展的现状，并对研究结果予以分析评价。     

Re-considering product design: a practical “road-map” for integration of sustainability issues

The proliferation of sustainability assessment principles, strategies, actions, and tools has created confusion about pathways forward for companies. It is unclear how existing approaches are complementary or distinct. How does a company assess current products and materials? How could designers create more sustainable products? What criteria, principles, approaches, and tools should be applied? Why? Is there a practical “road map” to guide product designers and product development managers in integrating sustainability issues into their decision-making processes?This article builds on previous frameworks for understanding the interconnections between various assessment principles, strategies, actions, and tools related to industrial ecology, human and labor rights, and corporate social responsibility [Waage S, Geiser K, Irwin F, Weissman A, Bertolucci M, Fisk P, et al. Fitting together the building blocks for sustainability: a revised model for integrating ecological, social, and financial factors into business decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production 2005;13(12):1117–206; Robèrt K-H, Schmidt-Bleek B, Aloisi de Larderel J, Basile G, Jansen JL, Kuehr R, et al. Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner Production 2002;10(3):197–214; Robèrt K-H. Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a framework for sustainable development, and to each other? Journal of Cleaner Production 2000;8(3):243–54]. Expanding on past work, this piece suggests a “road map” for application by product designers and product development managers. A four-phase process is offered for integrating systems and sustainability perspectives into product design, manufacturing, and delivery decisions.     

Evaluating and structuring indicators for wetland assessment

Wetland assessment has been a popular field of research worldwide. However, various indicators have been used in wetland assessment for different purposes and backgrounds and also because of the research limitations. Therefore, a more comprehensive, sound, and efficient indicator system is needed for researchers’ referencing to evaluate wetlands. After an extensive review of wetland assessment literatures, the reported indicators were evaluated using the developed assessment system, based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with three main goals: nature protection, function utilization, and sustainable development. Each indicator was evaluated using two methods. The first method was to study the percentage of the indicator application, and the second was to assess the weighted ratios assigned to the indicators according to principles of comparability, typicality, sensibility, and availability. The results of these two methods were compared to study the commonalities and specialties of the indicators. They also showed that some indicators were widely used, including biodiversity, weather and climate, hydrological change, and the output of wetland. On the other hand, other sustainable indicators were easily ignored, such as environmental carrying capacity and wetland planning. Furthermore, an indicator system for wetland assessment was structured and strategized to discuss how to choose indicators for wetland assessment under different conditions. The proposed approach can be used to guide the process of wetland assessments in the future.