Integrating switchgear breakers and contactors into a safety instrumented function

In the process industries, electrical circuit breakers are tripped for a variety of reasons including hazard prevention and mitigation. This paper will discuss the application of tripping electrical breakers for process safety reasons. It often occurs that a risk assessment study has determined the need to include the shutdown of a large electric motor as part of a safety instrumented function (SIF). In the process industries, it is common practice to control and protect large horsepower motors (typically 2000 HP and above), with medium-voltage switchgear breakers. Safety instrumented functions that include electric motors utilizing medium-voltage switchgear for tripping have unique final element subsystems, which require specialized knowledge in order to implement correctly. This paper will discuss the design considerations for integrating medium-voltage switchgear used for shutdown of an electric motor into a safety instrumented function. First, an overview of typical low and medium-voltage electrical equipment used for controlling and protecting electric motors will be discussed. Next, a review of generic sourced failure data for medium-voltage switchgear breakers will be presented. Focus will be on the taxonomy used to classify different breaker types and the relevant failure modes and effects used for quantifying performance. Next, specific SIF design details for tripping medium-voltage switchgear breakers will be analyzed in the context of achieving a certain integrity level. Parameters to be considered include hardware fault tolerance requirements, voting, available diagnostics, energize vs. de-energize to trip shutdown circuits, certified equipment vs. proven-in-use, and alternate means of shutdown (including manual intervention and protective relaying). This paper will also analyze the common electrical equipment that is shared among potential protection layers used to trip the same breaker, and determine how much credit can be taken considering common cause failure. Finally, inspection, test, and preventive maintenance (ITPM) of medium-voltage switchgear will be discussed as a means for maintaining the electrical equipment in the “as good as new” condition.     

Forced dispersion of LNG vapor with water curtain

Installation of effective safety measures to prevent and mitigate an accidental LNG release is critical. Water curtains are usually inexpensive, simple and reliable and currently have been recognized as an efficient technique to control and mitigate various hazards in the process industries including LNG industry. Actions of a water spray consist of a combination of several physical mechanisms. Detailed analysis of the complex mechanisms and the effects of water spray features to control and mitigate potential LNG vapor cloud are still unclear. This paper discusses the experimental research conducted by MKOPSC to study the physical phenomena involved and the effect of different types of water curtains parameters when applied for LNG vapor. The data from medium scale out-door experiments at the Brayton Fire Training School (BFTF), Texas, are summarized here to understand the relative importance of induced mechanical mixing effects, dilution with air, and heat transfer between water droplets and the LNG vapor. Field test results have determined that water curtains can reduce the concentration of the LNG vapor cloud. Due to the water curtain mechanisms of entrainment of air, dilution of vapor with entrained air, transfer of momentum and heat to the gas cloud, water curtain can disperse LNG vapor cloud to some extent.     

Making a case for the consideration of trust,justice, and power in conservation relationships

In conservation, trust and justice are increasingly recognized as both intrinsically valuable and critical for successful socioecological outcomes. However, the interdependence between these concepts has not been explored. The conservation trust literature provides examples of efforts to build trust between conservationists and local actors; yet, these interventions are often conceived to incentivize local cooperation within dominant paradigms. We argue that when trust building is promoted as a technical fix that does not plan in advance to address power asymmetries in conservation practice, inequities may inadvertently be re-embedded. Therefore, we conceptualized a framework that joins trust, justice, and power so that critical analyses of conservation partnerships can be more effectively undertaken. We drew on environmental justice theory to better calibrate the trust literature for the historical-political settings of conservation, especially in the Global South. Justice and trust share strong theoretical links where perceptions of justice shape a willingness to trust, and, equally, trust is a precondition for justice to be perceived. Different forms of trust connect to varied domains of justice and power in different ways, which mediates the outcomes of interventions. We applied our framework to case studies to explore how these interdependences play out in practice. Failure of agencies to attend to issues of maldistribution, misrecognition of cultural values and knowledge, and exclusion from participation strongly compromised trust. Moreover, the ways in which nature-dependent communities and marginalized conservation workers are trusted, or the conditions under which they give trust, can lead to partnerships being perceived as just or unjust. Focusing on trust and justice can help identify power dynamics so they can be addressed more readily and create space for alternative understandings of partnerships.