Optimal exploitation of energy resources: Solar power and electricity generation in below sea level basins

This paper analyzes the generation of hydroelectric power by the transfer of seawater to locations which are significantly below sea level (e.g., the Dead Sea in Israel and the Qatara depression in Egypt) combined with solar energy that via evaporation will perpetuate the hydroelectric power capacity. Two scenarios are depicted. The first focuses on optimal planning of the canal capacity and optimal use of its water to generate hydroelectric power while filling the basin to its steady-state level. The second includes the impact of solar pools as a new technology whose date of adoption is a random event. It is shown that the optimal flow of water through the canal depends on the relationship between optimal canal capacity and the rate of water evaporation in the basin. The optimal design of the canal can be considered a hybrid between depletion of a natural resouce (the height differences in filling up the basin) and use of a renewable resource (solar energy to evaporate the basin water). The optimal policy is shown to consist of sequential intervals, some of which may vanish under certain conditions: first, the operation of the canal at full capacity; then the gradual decrease of water flow at a rate equal to the elasticity of the marginal product of electricity generation times the sum of interest rate and the marginal evaporation rate; and, finally, the stabilization of the water flow at the rate of steady-state evaporation. The stochastic model with the introduction of solar pools technology treated as a random event is formulated as a two-stage maximization problem. It is shown that, in contrast to the scenario without solar pools, the canal may be operated underutilizing its capacity in the initial period. But even in this case, the quantity of water flowing through the canal is a nonincreasing monotonic function over time with a jump in the quantity of flow at the date the solar pools are introduced.     

What's the difference between reengineering and tqem?

Reengineering has become the latest corporate management buzzword, replacing, in many cases, total quality management as the panacea for industrial ills. How different are reengineering and total quality management (TQM), if at all, and how does each apply to environmental management? In this article the authors examine the concepts of reengineering and TQM as they apply to environmental management.     

Two-goal regional environmental policy: The case of the Santa Ana river basin

In determining public policy measures, the value of information about the functional relationships between targets and instruments can hardly be understated. In the present paper these macrorelations are obtained for a competitive industry by way of aggregation over many individual firms following simple behavioristic patterns. With the exact knowledge of the macrorelations, obtaining the numerical values of the instruments becomes a simple mathematical programming problem. These principles are applied in examination of the water pollution problems generated by the dairy industry in the Santa Ana River Basin where local governments face the problem of controlling environmental quality with minimum opportunity costs in terms of output.     

Two-goal environmental policy: An integration of micro and micro ad hoc decision rules

A method of predicting and comparing the immediate impact of different environmental policies and of selecting the optimal policy is suggested in this paper. The degradation of water quality by a polluting industry is used to demonstrate this approach. Aggregation over this industry consists of firms with “putty clay” properties in production, and credit constraints in the capital market generate the macrorelations. The macrorelations which depend on the level of the policy variables are expressed in terms of probabilities and moments of the distribution of the microrelations and are used for different planning purposes.     

Measuring environmental success

Process improvement, environmental results, and customer satisfaction all can—and need to—be measured in order to achieve total quality environmental management. This article details why and how to take such measures, with examples of leading company practices.