Comparison of Aerobic and Anaerobic Biotreatment of Municipal Solid Waste

Abstract

To increase the operating lifetime of landfills and to lower leachate treatment costs, an increasing number of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills are being managed as either aerobic or anaerobic bioreactors. Landfill gas composition, respiration rates, and subsidence were measured for 400 days in 200-L tanks filled with fresh waste materials to compare the relative effectiveness of the two treatments. Tanks were prepared to provide the following conditions: (1) air injection and leachate recirculation (aerobic), (2) leachate recirculation (anaerobic), and (3) no treatment (anaerobic). Respiration tests on the aerobic wet tank showed a steady decrease in oxygen consumption rates from 1.3 mol/day at 20 days to 0.1 mol/day at 400 days. Aerobic wet tanks produced, on average, 6 mol of carbon dioxide (CO₂)/kg of MSW as compared with anaerobic wet tanks, which produced 2.2 mol methane/kg of MSW and 2.0 mol CO₂/kg methane. Over the test period, the aerobic tanks settled on average 35%, anaerobic tanks settled 21.7%, and the no-treatment tank settled 7.5%, equivalent to overall mass loss in the corresponding reactors. Aerobic tanks reduced stabilization time and produced negligible odor compared with anaerobic tanks, possibly because of the 2 orders of magnitude lower leachate ammonia levels in the aerobic tank. Both treatment regimes provide the opportunity for disposal and remediation of liquid waste.     

Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic biotreatment of municipal solid waste

To increase the operating lifetime of landfills and to lower leachate treatment costs, an increasing number of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills are being managed as either aerobic or anaerobic bioreactors. Landfill gas composition, respiration rates, and subsidence were measured for 400 days in 200-L tanks filled with fresh waste materials to compare the relative effectiveness of the two treatments. Tanks were prepared to provide the following conditions: (1) air injection and leachate recirculation (aerobic), (2) leachate recirculation (anaerobic), and (3) no treatment (anaerobic). Respiration tests on the aerobic wet tank showed a steady decrease in oxygen consumption rates from 1.3 mol/day at 20 days to 0.1 mol/day at 400 days. Aerobic wet tanks produced, on average, 6 mol of carbon dioxide (CO2)/kg of MSW as compared with anaerobic wet tanks, which produced 2.2 mol methane/kg of MSW and 2.0 mol CO2/kg methane. Over the test period, the aerobic tanks settled on average 35%, anaerobic tanks settled 21.7%, and the no-treatment tank settled 7.5%, equivalent to overall mass loss in the corresponding reactors. Aerobic tanks reduced stabilization time and produced negligible odor compared with anaerobic tanks, possibly because of the 2 orders of magnitude lower leachate ammonia levels in the aerobic tank. Both treatment regimes provide the opportunity for disposal and remediation of liquid waste.     

Selenium distribution and fluxes in intertidal wetlands, San Francisco Bay, California

Selenium (Se) concentrations exceeding ecological guidelines for sediments and suspended particulate matter (SPM) have been observed in the northern reach of the San Francisco Bay estuary. Longterm availability of elevated Se in wetland sediments depends in part on the fluxes controlling Se distribution. The relative contribution of sedimentary vs. post-depositional Se fluxes in two San Francisco Bay intertidal wetlands was estimated. Selenium concentrations on surface wetland sediments were compared with levels on SPM, and with previously established background levels in San Francisco Bay sediments. Sediment Se fluxes to the wetlands were measured directly using sediment traps. Although dissolved Se concentrations are higher than particulate Se concentrations in San Francisco Bay water, sediment input into the system provides the major flux of Se. Strong correlation between Se and C on SPM (r2 = 0.81) indicates the importance of organic particulate deposition. Dependence on sediment texture was qualitatively established by measuring Se on particle-size separates. Normalization to Al showed that 65% of Se spatial variability is related to sediment texture. Selenium is further enriched in the marsh via post-depositional inputs, probably due to in situ adsorption from overlying water and chemical reduction. According to sediment flux measurements, enrichment in the marsh is equivalent to 20 to 25% of the particulate Se flux, thereby defining the marsh as a Se sink. These findings highlight the need for more intensive monitoring of SPM as the major source of Se to intertidal wetlands.