排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Andrea Alatorre Johanna Depenthal Elizabeth Shapiro-Garza 《Conservation biology》2021,35(5):1451-1462
Integrated conservation approaches (ICAs) are employed by governments, communities, and nongovernmental organizations worldwide seeking to achieve outcomes with dual benefits for biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Although ICAs are frequently implemented concurrently, interactions among ICAs and the synergies or trade-offs that result are rarely considered during program design, implementation, and evaluation. In support of more deliberate and effective use of ICAs, we examined interactions among four well-known strategies: biosphere reserves (BRs), voluntary protected areas (VPAs), payments for ecosystem services (PES), and community forest management (CFM). Through a comparative case study, we analyzed interactions among spatially or temporally clustered ICAs implemented on communally held and managed lands in three ecologically and socioeconomically distinct regions of Mexico. Our research methods combined policy analysis with data gathered through participant observation and semistructured interviews (n = 78) and focus groups (n = 5) with government officials, implementers, and participants involved in ICAs in 28 communities. Despite the significant differences among the regions in which they were implemented, we found that key actors at each level of involvement generally perceived interactions among ICAs as synergistic. The PES programs were perceived to strengthen protected areas by reducing forest cover loss in and around BRs, fostering proconservation attitudes, and incentivizing the establishment of VPAs. Communities that invested PES income in CFM were motivated to conserve forests beyond the duration of PES programs, and CFM in buffer zones was perceived to strengthen BRs by maintaining forest cover and generating income for communities. We also identified key social and environmental factors that can influence these interaction effects among ICAs. Based on these findings, we recommend further study of ICA interactions and intentionally complementary policy design to maximize positive environmental and social outcomes. 相似文献
2.
3.
Lisa A. Bergin 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2009,22(3):257-271
In this paper I critique two popular, non-scientific attitudes toward genetically engineered foods. In doing so, I will be
employing the concepts of ambiguity, purity/impurity, control/resistance, and unity/diversity as developed by Latina feminist
metaphysicians. I begin by casting a critical eye toward a specific anti-biotech account of transgenic food crops, an account
that I will argue relies on an anti-feminist metaphysics. I then cast that same critical eye toward a specific pro-biotech
account, arguing that it also relies on such an anti-feminist metaphysics. I will argue further that this metaphysics yields
a less accurate account of genetics. I end by arguing that if we adopt a Latina feminist metaphysics we can more accurately
understand plants, genetics, and genetic engineering. 相似文献
1