用悬液Wien效应探测阳离子在黄棕壤和黑土胶粒双电层中分布的初步研究

研究了采用悬液Wien效应测定反号离子在土壤胶粒双电层中分布的方法原理,及不同阳离子在黄棕壤和黑土胶粒双电层中的分布规律.试验条件下,这2种土壤的Na+饱和胶粒的表面电导率最大,而使表面电导率最小的阳离子是不同的,黄棕壤为Cu2+,黑土则为Cd2+.黄棕壤和黑土胶粒的表面电导率随阳离子的变化顺序分别为Na+K+Cd2+Pb2+Ca2+La3+Cu2+和Na+K+Pb2+La3+Cu2+Ca2+Cd2+.除Na+和Cd2+外,几乎所有阳离子在黄棕壤胶粒扩散层中的比率(ECS/ECad)明显小于黑土,其中Cd2+在黄棕壤和黑土胶粒扩散层中的比率分别为0.174和0.0872.黄棕壤和黑土胶粒的ζ电位随阳离子价型的变化顺序,除了钙饱和黑土外,与土壤胶粒表面电导率随阳离子价型的变化顺序完全一致.     

大地介质极化率和二次场衰减特性时序观测与研究

大地介质极化率和二次场衰减特性时序观测是探索介质新的电性参数作为前兆观测项目的研究课题。经两年的观测研究发现,极化率存在年变化形态;主要研究的放电时段应放在１０～１００ｍｓ范围;在观测时段（１９９４ ０３～１９９５ １１）内台站３００ｋｍ范围发生的唯一一次大于５．０级的苍山５．２级地震（△３０４ｋｍ）前,极化率参数异常不明显,而极化率衰减度在该次地震前出现异常,衰减曲线极大值位移、曲线畸变、半衰时亦出现高值。对比地电阻率与极化率衰减度和半衰时的观测数据,在苍山５．２级地震前异常时间同步,呈低电阻率、高衰减度、高半衰时变化。研究结果表明应用介质新电性参数极化率作为前兆观测项目是可行的。     

Retention of PCDDS and PCDFS in the liver of the rat and hamster after oral administration of a municipal incinerator fly ash extract

A single dose of an extract from 16 and 5 grams fly ash was administered orally to male rats and hamsters. In the rat 1,2,3,7,8‐PnCDD had the highest retention (41%) in the liver. The congener with the highest retention in the liver of the hamster was 2,3,4,7,8‐PnCDF (70.9%). In two oral multiple dose experiments with rats, highest liver retentions were found for 1,2,3,7,8‐PnCDD (51.7%) and 1,2,3,6,7,8‐HxCDD (59.8%). With the exception of 2,3,4,6,7‐PnCDF, all PCDDs and PCDFs retained in the liver of rat and hamster had a 2,3,7,8 chlorine substitution pattern. In both types of experiments with rats the retention of 2,3,7,8‐TCDF in the liver was very low, 1.1–2.8% of the total dose. In the liver of the hamster retention of 2,3,7,8‐TCDF was almost equal to that of 2,3,7,8‐TCDD, indicating that the hamster is probably metabolizing 2,3,7,8‐TCDF Jess efficiently than the rat. In all experiments 1,2,3,7,8‐PnCDD and 2,3,4,7,8‐PnCDF were retained in the liver more efficiently than 2,3,7,8‐TCDD. Based on first order pharmacokinetic calculations, it was found that the earlier published k_e value of 0.55 for 2,3,7,8‐TCDF in the liver of the rat was also applicable. Using the same calculations for 2,3,7,8‐TCDD (k_e = 0.029) a 30% difference was found between calculated and actual measurements, but calculated results were still within the 95% confidence limits of the actual measurements.