基于农户兼业视角的农业废弃物资源循环利用意愿及其影响因素比较

基于农户兼业视角，利用湖北省农村地区的微观调查数据，运用Logistic回归模型比较了不同兼业类型农户农业废弃物资源循环利用意愿及其影响因素。研究结果显示：（1）大部分农户具有农业废弃物资源循环利用意愿，其中纯农户和一兼农户的利用意愿相当，且高出二兼农户；（2）农户对农业废弃物资源价值的感知是影响不同兼业类型农户利用意愿的共同因素，农户感知农业废弃物资源的价值越高，其利用意愿也越强；（3）影响不同兼业类型农户利用意愿的因素有明显差异，性别对农户尤其是二兼农户的利用意愿有显著的正向作用；年龄对纯农户和二兼农户利用意愿的影响均为负，尤其是对纯农户影响更大；土地经营规模对农户尤其是一兼农户的利用意愿有显著的正向影响；对获取经济收益的感知正向作用于一兼农户和二兼农户的利用意愿，尤其是对一兼农户有更大程度影响；对纯农户而言，对自身经济条件的感知也显著影响其利用意愿

COMPARISONS OF FARMERS WILLINGNESS TO RECYCLE RESOURCES OF AGRICULTURAL WASTE AND INFLUENCING FACTORS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF FARMERS CONCURRENT BUSINESS——AN EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM HUBEI PROVINCE

Agricultural waste was called the “Misplaced Resources” for its inclusion of enormous energy, and its direct emissions without scientific treatment would cause environment pollution and resource waste. From the perspective of farmers concurrent business, using survey data from rural areas of Hubei, the Logistic regression model was applied into the comparative analysis of willingness to recycle agricultural waste resources and influencing factors among farmers with different types of concurrent business. The results indicated that: (1)785% of the full time farmers (farmers whose proportion of non farm income to total household income is within 10%) were willing to recycle agricultural waste resources, and nearly the same, that of the type I farmers (farmers whose proportion of non farm income to total income is between 10% and 50%) was 798%, and both were higher than that of type II farmers (more than half of their income is from non farm business). (2)The perception to the value of agricultural waste resources was the common factor that influenced farmers willingness to recycle with different types of concurrent business. The greater farmers perception to the value of agricultural waste resources was, the higher their willingness to recycle. (3)The factors influencing recycling willingness were quite different among farmers with different types of concurrent business. In details, gender had a positive impact on farmers recycling willingness, especially on type II farmers, namely relative to female, male farmers recycling willingness were much higher. The significant negative effects of age on full time and type II farmer recycling willingness were observed, and especially greater on the former. The land management scale influenced farmers recycling willingness positively, and particularly influenced type I farmers willingness. The perception to acquisition of economic income had a positive impact on type I and type II farmers recycling willingnesses, and a greater impact on type I farmers. The perception to their own economic conditions particularly influenced full time farmers recycling willingness, which meant that it would be higher if they perceived better economic conditions. In addition, it was noteworthy that household net income had a positive effect on full time farmers recycling willingness, and the greater full time farmers household net income was, the higher their willingness. And the perception to their own learning ability had a positive impact on type II farmers recycling willingness, that is to say, farmers would have higher willingness if they perceived ease of learning agricultural waste resources recycling concepts and methods. In conclusion, we got the following policy implications. (1) Improve farmers, especially female farmers recycling willingness perceived value of agricultural waste resources through educational training and propaganda, and highlight its economic benefits to attract and encourage more participation of farmers. (2) Promote land reform system and household register system so as to give more land to full time and type I farmers. (3) Increase fund input and subsidy to improve farmers economic conditions and their willingness to pay for the recycling of agricultural waste resources. (4) Strengthen political support for the perfection of social security system to improve old farmers living standard and avoid their constraints on agricultural production