首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于GIS和AHP的芦山地震灾区泥石流危险性评价
引用本文:王骏,丁明涛,庙成,周鹏,黄英.基于GIS和AHP的芦山地震灾区泥石流危险性评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(11):1580.
作者姓名:王骏  丁明涛  庙成  周鹏  黄英
作者单位:(西南科技大学环境与资源学院,四川 绵阳 621010)
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41371185;41101164);四川省科技厅项目(2013HH0057;2010SZ0308);四川省教育厅重点项目(13ZA0160);西南科技大学研究生创新基金项目(14ycx045;14ycx044)
摘    要:采用层次分析法,通过判断矩阵建立起各要素之间的数量关系,选取坡度、地层岩性、断裂带、植被覆盖、地震烈度及年降雨量作为评价指标,并阐明了各指标与泥石流之间的相互关系。建立以地理信息系统为平台的泥石流危险性评价模型,得到地震灾区泥石流危险等级分区图。通过评价,初步认识到研究区内芦山县、天全县、名山区、雨城区位于泥石流极高危险区,且评价分区结果与区内地灾点分布特征相吻合

关 键 词:芦山地震灾区  泥石流  危险性评价  层次分析法

HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF DEBRIS FLOW BASED ON GIS AND AHP IN LUSHAN EARTHQUAKE DISASTER AREA
WANG Jun,DING Ming tao,MIAO Cheng,ZHOU Peng,HUANG Ying.HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF DEBRIS FLOW BASED ON GIS AND AHP IN LUSHAN EARTHQUAKE DISASTER AREA[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtza Basin,2014,23(11):1580.
Authors:WANG Jun  DING Ming tao  MIAO Cheng  ZHOU Peng  HUANG Ying
Institution:(School of Environment and Resource, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China)
Abstract:A seven magnitude earthquake occurred in Lushan County, Yaan City, Sichuan Province on April 20, 2013, which caused 193 deaths or missing and with a loss amounting to RMB 1.4 billion. The structure of mountains, rock and soil was severely damaged by the Lushan earthquake, which induced a series of geological disasters including landslide, collapse, debris flow and so on. The serious geological disasters threatened the life, the property of the local people, the significant infrastructure and even the ecological condition. Exhaustive study and hazard assessment of debris flow in Lushan earthquake were of important realistic significance. Using the AHP method, we selected six assessment factors, namely terrain slope, lithology, fracture zone, vegetation cover, earthquake intensity and annual rainfall. In the application of AHP method, the weight of each factor was determined. The weight is 0.186 for seismic intensity, is 0.284 for rainfall factor, 0.176 for slope, 0.169 for lithology, 0.108 for fracture zone, and 0.077 for vegetation cover. The study area was eventually classified into five categories (extremely low, low, moderate, high, extremely high), which were determined according to the views of experts as well as the understanding of the regional development of geological hazards. Grade 1 to 5 were used to indicate the different hazard levels. Grade 5 represented the most dangerous, while Grade 1 represented the least dangerous. The choice of GIS technology for spatial analysis completed the study using the weighted superposition model. Applying the spatial analysis tool in GIS, a zoning map of debris flow hazard assessment was obtained. The result showed a regular pattern that the study area such as Lushan County, Tianquan County, Mingshan District, and Yucheng District located in the extremely high hazard area, and its level of hazard zoning was mainly affected by the earthquake and rainfall factors. We draws a conclusion that the division of the study area and the feature of geological hazard point distribution were in substantial agreement.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号