首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于碳足迹的江西省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空差异
引用本文:张婷,蔡海生,张学玲.基于碳足迹的江西省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空差异[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(6):767.
作者姓名:张婷  蔡海生  张学玲
作者单位:(1.江西农业大学江西省鄱阳湖流域农业与生态工程技术研究中心,江西 南昌 330045;2.江西农业大学南昌市鄱阳湖生态重点实验室,江西 南昌 330045; 3.江西农业大学职业技术学院,江西 南昌 330045 
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(40861029);江西省软科学项目(20112BBA10027);江西省科技计划社发项目(20111BBG70003-2);江西省高校人文社科项目(GL1030);江西省社会科学研究“十二五”规划课题(11YJ12、11YJ13)
摘    要:利用2001~2010年江西省农业投入和农作物统计数据,采用碳排放系数法计算了江西省农田生态系统碳源/汇及碳足迹,分析了江西省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空特征,并进一步分析了碳足迹变化特征及原因。结果表明:(1)2001~2010年,江西省农业投入引起的碳排放量从2001年的11910 1×106 t,增加至2010年的5872 8×106 t,增加了103倍,农业机械化对碳排放总量贡献率最大。碳排放强度呈现先增加后减少的趋势。2008年赣州市碳排放量最多,景德镇市最少;(2)2001~2010年江西省农田生态系统碳吸收量先减少,后逐年增加,到2010年又减少,整个2001~2010年间增加3209 9×106 t。各类农作物中,水稻碳吸收量最多。2009年碳吸收量最多的是宜春市,最少的是萍乡市;(3)江西省农田生态系统碳足迹从2001年的07518×106 C〖DK〗·hm-2〖DK〗·a-1,增加至2009年的1473 4×106 C〖DK〗·hm-2〖DK〗·a-1,单位面积碳足迹呈现逐年增加的趋势。2008年碳足迹最多的是赣州市,最少的是萍乡市。南昌市、景德镇市、吉安市和宜春市表现为生态盈余,其余表现为生态赤字。江西省应减少农药、化肥等的使用,控制农业机械化,特别是赣州市,从而达到减少碳排放的目的

关 键 词:农田生态系统  碳排放  碳吸收  碳足迹  江西省

SPATIAL TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF FARMLAND ECOSYSTEM CARBON SOURCE/SINK BASED ON CARBON FOOTPRINT IN JIANGXI PROVINCE 
ZHANG Ting,,CAI Hai sheng,,ZHANG Xue ling.SPATIAL TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF FARMLAND ECOSYSTEM CARBON SOURCE/SINK BASED ON CARBON FOOTPRINT IN JIANGXI PROVINCE [J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtza Basin,2014,23(6):767.
Authors:ZHANG Ting    CAI Hai sheng    ZHANG Xue ling
Institution:(1.Agriculture and Ecology Engineering Research Center of Po yang Lake Watershed in Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 2.Ecology Key Laboratory of Po yang Lake in Nanchang, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 3.Vocational Technology College of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
Abstract:The processes of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle and source change are key scientific problems in global climate change and ecology now. We used statistic data in Jiangxi Province from 2001 to 2010, and the carbon emissions coefficient method to calculate the carbon source/sink of farmland ecosystems and carbon footprints in Jiangxi Province, and analyzed the spatiotemporal differences of carbon source/sink and the changes and reasons of carbon footprints. The results showed as follows. (1) From 2001 to 2010, carbon emissions caused by farmland use in Jiangxi Province increased by 103 times, from 11910 1×106 t in 2001 to 5872 8×106 t in 2010. Agricultural mechanization was the biggest contribution to farmland ecosystem carbon emissions in Jiangxi Province. Carbon intensity of farmland ecosystems in Jiangxi Province showed a trend of increased followed by decreased as a whole. With respect to the regional difference, Ganzhou had the largest farmland ecosystem carbon emissions in Jiangxi Province in 2008; Jingdezhen was the minimum, and its carbon emissions intensity was also the lowest. (2) Carbon uptake of farmland ecosystem in Jiangxi Province during 2001-2010 decreased at first, then increased year by year, and decreased in 2010; the whole carbon uptake from 2001 to 2010 increased by 3209 9×106 t. All kinds of crops, rice had the largest carbon uptake, accounting for more than 75%. From the point of carbon absorption intensity, farmland ecosystem carbon intensity in Jiangxi Province was enhanced followed by weakened. From a regional view, Yichun had the most carbon uptake in various districts of Jiangxi Province in 2009, while Pingxiang had the least. The highest carbon absorption intensity was Fuzhou city, while Jiujiang was the weakest. (3) The carbon footprint of farmland ecosystem in Jiangxi Province rose from 0751 8×106 C〖DK〗·hm-2〖DK〗·a-1, to 1473 4×106 C〖DK〗·hm-2〖DK〗·a-1 in 2009, increased by 0698 1×106 C〖DK〗·hm-2〖DK〗·a-1, and per unit carbon footprint presented an increasing trend year by year. From the perspective of the regional differences, Ganzhou was the most carbon footprint city in Jiangxi Province in 2008, while Pingxiang was the least. The per unit carbon footprint of Ganzhou was the largest, while Jian was the smallest. Nanchang, Jingdezhen and Yichun performed ecological surplus, while other seven regions showed ecological deficit. Ganzhou had the largest ecological deficit, while Yingtan city had the least deficit. Conclusion: Jiangxi Province should reduce the use of pesticides, fertilizers, etc., and control the utilization of agricultural mechanization, especially in Ganzhou city, in order to achieve the purpose of reducing carbon emissions
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号