首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国七大流域水资源综合管理绩效动态评价
引用本文:吴丹,王亚华.中国七大流域水资源综合管理绩效动态评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(1):32.
作者姓名:吴丹  王亚华
作者单位:(1.北方工业大学经济管理学院,北京 100144; 2.清华大学公共管理学院,北京 100084)
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(70973064);中国博士后科学基金项目(2012M510035);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJCZH195)
摘    要:通过国内外相关文献研究与实地调研,结合流域水资源管理的社会经济发展目标,提出了流域水资源综合管理绩效评价的内涵,构建了我国七大流域水资源综合管理绩效评价指标体系与动态评价模型。并应用该模型实证分析了1999~2010年我国七大流域水资源综合管理绩效指数动态变化趋势,对水资源综合管理绩效水平优劣进行对比分析,揭示水资源综合管理绩效指数动态变化的动因。评价显示,1999~2010年,七大流域水资源综合管理绩效指数均有不同程度的提升,按提升速度排序依次为海河、黄河、松辽、太湖、珠江、长江、淮河,按相对管理绩效水平排序依次为海河、珠江、黄河、松辽、太湖、长江、淮河;研究表明,水资源综合管理绩效指数受人均用水量、综合耗水率、农业用水比例、万元工业增加值用水量、万元GDP废水排放量、水资源开发利用率的影响较大

关 键 词:流域  水资源  综合管理绩效  指标  动态评价

DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN SEVEN RIVER BASIN OF CHINA
WU Dan,WANG Ya hua.DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN SEVEN RIVER BASIN OF CHINA[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtza Basin,2014,23(1):32.
Authors:WU Dan  WANG Ya hua
Institution:(1.School of Economics and Management,North China University of Technology,Beijing 100144,China;2.Tsinghua University,School of Public Policy &|Management,Beijing 100084,China
Abstract:Based on literature research and field investigation, the connotation of performance evaluation of water resources management was given, the indicator system of performance evaluation and a dynamic evaluation model of water resources management in seven River Basin of china was designed, with reference to the socioeconomic development objectives of water resources management. The model was used to analyze the changing trend of the performance index of water resources management in 1999-2010, and revealed the causes of its changing trend. Then, the superiority and inferiority of performance level among different drainage areas was comparatively analyzed. Results showed the performance index of water resources management of seven drainage areas in China was improved with different levels during 1999-2010, the order of the growth rate of the performance index is Haihe River, Yellow River, Songliao River, Taihu Lake, Pearl River, Yangtze River, Huaihe River, and the order of relative management performance level is Haihe River, Pearl river, Huanghe river, Songliao river, Taihu Lake, Yangtze river, Huaihe river. During 1999-2003, the highest management performance level is Songliao River Basin. During 2003-2007 and 2007-2010, the highest management performance level is Pearl River Basin, During 1999-2010, the lowest management performance level is Huaihe River Basin. The study also revealed that the performance index of water resources management was greatly influenced by per capita water consumption, comprehensive water consumption rate, agricultural water proportion, water use per industrial GDP, waste water discharge per GDP, and utilization ratio of water resources
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号