首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

乐安河流域面源营养物质输移研究
引用本文:夏雨,黄灵光,鄢帮有,方豫.乐安河流域面源营养物质输移研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(4):504.
作者姓名:夏雨  黄灵光  鄢帮有  方豫
作者单位:(1.南昌大学理学院,江西 南昌 330031;2.江西省山江湖开发治理委员会办公室,江西 南昌 330046)
基金项目:江西省科技计划项目“基于高分辨率影像的鄱阳湖湿地植被群落快速监测关键技术研究”(20121BBE50019);江西省自然(青年)基金“鄱阳湖流域河湖交错带水环境研究”(20122BAB203022);江西省科技支撑计划“水位调控对鄱阳湖苔草群落发育与功能的影响”(20122BBG70074);江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人培养计划专项“鄱阳湖湿地生态监测与评估关键技术研究”(20123BCB22008)
摘    要:根据乐安河流域2009~2011年17个监测断面的定期观测数据,初步分析了流域内总氮、总磷的时空分布规律。运用WATLAC水文模型和MESAW营养盐模型,对乐安河流域营养物质产出与输移进行模拟,估算主要土地利用方式营养物输出系数、产出量及河道滞留率。研究表明:该流域氮年产出量为10 4380 t,对流域出口处的贡献量为5 8557 t,滞留率为439%;磷年产出量为1 0037 t,对流域出口贡献量为3449 t,滞留率为656%。由于氮的可溶性强和流动性更强,因此比磷的产生量和贡献量都更多,并且滞留率受降雨影响更为显著。延长污染物的迁移路径和时间,可增加营养物的滞留率,减少对河道的贡献量

关 键 词:乐安河流域  面源污染  MESAW模型  滞留率

RESEARCH ON TRANSFORMATION OF DIFFUSE NUTRIENTS IN THE LEANHE WATERSHED
XIA Yu,,HUANG Ling guang,YAN Bang you,FANG Yu.RESEARCH ON TRANSFORMATION OF DIFFUSE NUTRIENTS IN THE LEANHE WATERSHED[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtza Basin,2014,23(4):504.
Authors:XIA Yu    HUANG Ling guang  YAN Bang you  FANG Yu
Institution:(1.School of Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;2.Office for Mountain River Lake Development and Management Committee of Jiang Province, Nanchang 330046, China
Abstract:Diffuse water pollution has become one of the most important factors for environmental pollution. Research on emission, transportation, transformation, and management of non point source water pollution is helpful for effectively preventing lake pollution. The Leanhe Watershed is a typical agricultural based watershed of Poyang Lake watershed. The non point source pollution in this watershed impacts water quality issue which influences ecology and society. Based on observed data from 17 monitoring stations within the Leanhe Watershed from 2009 to 2011, the temporal and spatial variation patterns were analyzed. The WATLAC Model and MESAW Model are combined to simulate the nutrient emission and transformation in the Leanhe watershed, and to calculate the nutrient load and retention rate in river course. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows. (1)The distribution and seasonal changes of nitrogen and phosphorus are basically similar. They increased from April by the beginning of rainfall and agricultural season, reached a high level in June, and then dropped dramatically to the lowest value in September for annually maximum water volume in the Leanhe Watershed. After September, the values recovered for the dry season and reached the highest point for the annually minimum water value int December. The nutrient concentrations were generally higher in downstream than in upstream. This result indicated that agricultural fertilization was the main source of diffuse N in soils, the rainfall runoff was the main driving factor for N losses, and forest land had an obviously constraint effect on non point pollution. (2)Non point source based nitrogen and phosphorus emission and transformation in the Leanhe watershed was simulated by the MESAW Model. The result shows that: the nitrogen emission from the Leanhe Watershed was 10 4380 t/a, the contribution to the watershed mouth was 5 855.7 t, and the retention rate of nitrogen in the Leanhe Watershed was 439%. In terms of phosphorus, the emission from the Leanhe Watershed was 1 0037 t/a, the contribution to the watershed mouth was 3449 t, and the retention rate of phosphorus in the Leanhe Watershed was 656%. Those data indicated the nitrogen had higher emission and contribution value than phosphorus because of its higher solubility and fluxility. The main physical form of phosphorus was particle, which could be detained by sedimentation. Phosphorus had therefore a higher retention rate than nitrogen. (3)The retention rates of nitrogen and phosphorus in the wet season were higher than in the dry season, because less precipitation in the dry season leaded to a lower amount of runoff flowing down the river course slowly. However, the storm in June of 2011 caused huge dissolved nitrogen going into river course in short time. The N retention rate in this season was 15%, lower than that in 2010. The storm also moved some particle phosphorus that has been absorbed in the soil for a long time to the river, so P retention rate in this season was 10%, higher than that in 2010.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号