首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Taxing Meat: Taking Responsibility for One’s Contribution to Antibiotic Resistance
Authors:Alberto Giubilini  Patrick Birkl  Thomas Douglas  Julian Savulescu  Hannah Maslen
Institution:1.Oxford Martin School,University of Oxford,Oxford,UK;2.Department of Animal Bioscience,University of Guelph,Guelph,Canada;3.Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics,University of Oxford,Oxford,UK
Abstract:Antibiotic use in animal farming is one of the main drivers of antibiotic resistance both in animals and in humans. In this paper we propose that one feasible and fair way to address this problem is to tax animal products obtained with the use of antibiotics. We argue that such tax is supported both by (a) deontological arguments, which are based on the duty individuals have to compensate society for the antibiotic resistance to which they are contributing through consumption of animal products obtained with the use of antibiotics; and (b) a cost-benefit analysis of taxing such animal products and of using revenue from the tax to fund alternatives to use of antibiotics in animal farming. Finally, we argue that such a tax would be fair because individuals who consume animal products obtained with the use of antibiotics can be held morally responsible, i.e. blameworthy, for their contribution to antibiotic resistance, in spite of the fact that each individual contribution is imperceptible.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号