Mechanisms of habitat segregation between an invasive and an indigenous mussel: settlement,post-settlement mortality and recruitment |
| |
Authors: | Sarah J Bownes Christopher D McQuaid |
| |
Institution: | (1) Coastal Research Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa |
| |
Abstract: | The mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis is highly invasive worldwide, but displays varying degrees of local and regional coexistence with indigenous mussels through
spatial habitat segregation. We investigated the roles of settlement, post-settlement mortality, juvenile growth and recruitment
in partial habitat segregation between the invasive M. galloprovincialis and the indigenous mussel Perna perna on the south coast of South Africa. We used two study locations, Plettenberg Bay and Tsitsikamma, 70 km apart, with two sites
(separated by 300–400 m) per location, each divided into three vertical zones. There were no significant effects in Tsitsikamma,
where daily settlement and monthly recruitment were significantly lower than in Plettenberg Bay. In Plettenberg Bay, settlement
(primary and secondary) and recruitment of both species decreased upshore. Post-settlement mortality was measured over two
consecutive 6-day periods during a spring tide and a neap tide. For both species mortality was low on the low-shore. High-shore
mortality was consistently low for M. galloprovincialis, but increased dramatically for P. perna during spring tide. No data were obtained for growth of P. perna, but juvenile M. galloprovincialis grew more slowly farther upshore. P. perna recruited mainly in spring and summer, with a peak in summer far greater than for M. galloprovincialis. Recruitment of M. galloprovincialis was more protracted, continuing through autumn and winter. Thus local coexistence is due to a combination of pre- and post-recruitment
factors differing in importance for each species. P. perna is excluded from the high-shore by recruitment failure (low settlement, high mortality). High survival and slow growth in
juveniles may allow large densities of M. galloprovincialis to accumulate there, despite low settlement rates. With no differences between species in settlement or mortality on the
low-shore, exclusion of M. galloprovincialis from that zone is likely to be by post-recruitment processes, possibly strengthened by periodic heavy recruitments of P. perna. At larger scales, larval retention and protracted recruitment contribute to the success of M. galloprovincialis at Plettenberg Bay, while recruitment limitation may explain why M. galloprovincialis is less successful at other sites. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|