首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

小流域地下水与地表水微生物组成结构差异及其成因分析
引用本文:黄小兰,陈建耀,周世宁,谢丽纯,杨雪韵,蒋华波,董林垚.小流域地下水与地表水微生物组成结构差异及其成因分析[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(9):1647-1654.
作者姓名:黄小兰  陈建耀  周世宁  谢丽纯  杨雪韵  蒋华波  董林垚
作者单位:1. 江西师范大学地理与环境学院,鄱阳湖湿地与流域研究教育部重点实验室,江西南昌330022;中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东广州510275
2. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东广州,510275
3. 中山大学生命科学学院,广东广州,510275
基金项目:国家“973”项目(2012CB417003);广东省自然科学基金项目(9251027501000021);江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ12186);广东水利科技创新与推广项目(2009-2011);江西省博士后科研项目择优资助(2012)
摘    要:对中山大学滨海水循环综合试验基地的河道水和地下水进行采样,运用16S rRNA基因分析方法,研究微生物的群落组成、结构,同时,通过Mothur软件分析不同采样点的系统发育多样性和文库稀释曲线.结果表明,上下游河道水和地下水均以变形菌(Proteobacteria),厚壁菌(Firmicutes),古菌(Archaea)为优势种群,变形菌在上游堰、下游堰、R1、R2、R3分别占各自总数的29.7%、30.3%、28.1%、20.9%、14.2%;厚壁菌在上游堰、下游堰、R1、R2、R3分别占各自总数的9.7%、20.3%、19.8%、8.6%、39.6%;古菌(不可培养的泉古菌和广古菌)在上游堰、下游堰、R1、R2、R3分别占各自总数的14.2%、12.3%、11.7%、12.1%、3.5%.表明地下水、地表水微生物组成结构有一定的趋同性.另一方面,酸杆菌(Acidobacteria)、硝化螺旋菌(Nitrospira)、拟杆菌(Bacteroidetes) 和Candidate division OPx等在不同采样点的丰度各异,不同埋藏条件下的地下水和地表水多样性指数与稀释曲线有所不同,揭示小流域的微生物组成、结构具有空间差异.研究显示,受周围水文地质条件、补给差异等影响,微生物种群随之演化,微生物特征与水文地质、化学离子密切相关.

关 键 词:小流域  地下水  地表水  微生物  差异  成因  
收稿时间:2012-02-09;

Cause on the differences of microorganism between small watershed surface water and underground water
HUANG Xiao-lan , CHEN Jian-yao , ZHOU Shi-ning , XIE Li-chun , YANG Xue-yun , JIANG Hua-bo , DONG Lin-yao.Cause on the differences of microorganism between small watershed surface water and underground water[J].China Environmental Science,2012,32(9):1647-1654.
Authors:HUANG Xiao-lan  CHEN Jian-yao  ZHOU Shi-ning  XIE Li-chun  YANG Xue-yun  JIANG Hua-bo  DONG Lin-yao
Institution:yao2(1.Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research,Ministry of Education,School of Geography and Environment,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China;2.School of Geography and Planning,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;3.School of Life Sciences,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)
Abstract:The surface and underground water of Sun Yat-sen University water cycle experiment base was sampled and analyzed by 16S rRNA gene analytical methods to acquire the data of microorganism communities’ distribution,then,the rarefaction curves and richness/diversity estimators were calculated and compared by Mothur software.Microbiological communities in groundwater were similar to those in surface water,with the predominant group of Proteobacterium,Firmicutes,Uncultured Archaeon(uncultured Crenarchaeote and Euryarchaeote).Proteobacteria made up 29.7%、30.3%、28.1%、20.9%、14.2% of the microbial communities from Shangyouyan,Xiayouyan,R1,R2,R3,respectively.The same samples from Shangyouyan,Xiayouyan,R1,R2,R3 also consisted of 9.7%、20.3%、19.8%、8.6%、39.6% Firmicutes and 14.2%、12.3%、11.7%、12.1%、3.5% Archaea,respectively.On the other hand,the data of richness and diversity estimators such as Chao1,Ace,Shannon,and Simpson indicated that microorganism diversities were different in groundwater and surface water,which showed the difference among those microorganism’s characteristics.The study concluded that microorganism evolves in response to the change of the hydrogeological and ionic conditions that are influenced by the water environment and the recharging of water resources.
Keywords:small watershed  groundwater  surface water  microorganism  difference  cause
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号