首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Carbon abatement in the fuel market with biofuels: Implications for second best policies
Authors:Christine Lasco Crago  Madhu Khanna
Institution:1. Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 217C Stockbridge, 80 Campus Center Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA;2. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics and Energy Biosciences Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1301 W. Gregory Drive, Urbana, IL 61822, USA
Abstract:A carbon tax on fuel would penalize carbon intensive fuels like gasoline and shift fuel consumption to less carbon intensive alternatives like biofuels. Since biofuel production competes for land with agricultural production, a carbon tax could increase land rents and raise food prices. This paper analyzes the welfare effect of a carbon tax on fuel consisting of gasoline and biofuel in the presence of a labor tax, with and without a biofuel subsidy. The market impacts of a carbon tax are also compared with that of a subsidy. Findings show that if a carbon tax increases biofuel demand, the tax interaction effect due to higher fuel prices is exacerbated by higher land rent and food prices and greater erosion of the carbon tax base. Thus, the second best optimal carbon tax for fuel is lower with biofuel in the fuel mix, especially if biofuel is subsidized.
Keywords:Carbon tax  Optimal fuel tax  Biofuel  Second best policy
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号