首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


China's water risk assessment and industrial source analysis based on the localization of WWF water risk assessment tools
Institution:1. School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, PR China;2. International School of Economics and Management, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, PR China;3. Development Research Center of the State Council, Beijing 100010, PR China;1. School of Public Administration, Xi''an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi''an, China;2. Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College London, London, UK;3. Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin, China;4. School of Design, NingboTech University, Ningbo, China;5. Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China;6. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Abstract:The WWF water risk assessment tool is a universal methodology, as the establishment of its indicators fully consider various types of natural and social environments. When this tool is applied to China, a large country with a complex water situation in a period of rapid development, appropriate localization adjustment is necessary to ensure that indicators are generally stable and assessment results are internationally comparable. Based on the localization of WWF water risk assessment tools, this is the first application assessing water risk in China in terms of physical risks, regulatory risks and reputation risks. It explores the sources of China's water risk from industrial sectors and constructs a classification index system according to the degree of water dependence and the level of water pollution. Using the classification index system and relevant data, we find the key industrial sectors, enterprises and production processes to reduce water risk in China's ten major water valleys and offer some effective and practical management suggestions. Due to the large regional differences of water risk-bearing capacity in China, the assessment results should be interpreted in combination with specific national conditions of China and emphasis should be laid on key areas and industries.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号