Comparison of various sampling methods for PCDDs and PCDFs in stack gas |
| |
Authors: | H. Hagenmaier, M. Kraft, W. J ger, U. Mayer, K. Lü tzke,D. Siegel |
| |
Affiliation: | 1 Institut für Organische Chemie der Univ. Tübingen, D-7400, Tübingen, Germany * Institut für Unweltanalytik Dr. Jäger, D-7400, Tübingen, Germany ** TÜV Rheinland, D-4300, Essen, Germany *** Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg, D-6800, Karlsruhe, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | There have been discussions about how complete PCDDs and PCDFs are sampled from stack gas of waste combustion plants by various sampling methods. In Germany, at present, a sampling method is used, which was first proposed by Nottrodt et al.1, consisting of a filter device, condenser, and an absorption train. Since this sampling procedure complicates sampling and analysis, we compared this “standard procedure” with a “dilution method”, where only a filter, impregnated with paraffin, is used as trapping device, and also tested the effectiveness of XAD-2 as an adsorption trap. As standard procedure the standard train was always used in parallel to other sampling methods. The results of four parallel sampling periods confirmed, that comparable results are obtained, when parallel sampling is carried out with the standard train. The result of our investigation can be summarized as follows: The total emission of PCDDs and PCDFs determined by different sampling procedures varies only insignificantly. This means that sampling and analysis for PCDDs and PCDFs in stack gas could be simplified considerably. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|