首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国城市绿化评价系统比较分析
引用本文:杨静怡,杨军,马履一,贾忠奎. 中国城市绿化评价系统比较分析[J]. 城市环境与城市生态, 2011, 0(4): 13-16
作者姓名:杨静怡  杨军  马履一  贾忠奎
作者单位:北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京100083
基金项目:北京市科技计划“北京宜居城市绿化体系建设关键技术研究与示范”项目(殉0060660000701);北京市教学委员会学科建设与研究生教育建设项目“北京市生态公益林质量升级关键技术研究”产学研联合培养研究生基地(CXYBL2008-2010)资助
摘    要:城市绿化在城市环境建设中起着至关重要的作用。为衡量城市绿化建设的水平和指导城市规划,有必要建立科学的绿化评价体系。分析和比较了中国现有的4种国家级城市绿化评价体系:国家园林城市标准、全国绿化模范城市标准、国家森林城市标准和国家生态园林城市标准,并从易得性、可比性、简易性、客观性等4个方面对具体的指标进行了分析。4种绿化...

关 键 词:城市绿化  评价指标  评价原则  指标权重

Comparison and Analysis of Evaluation System of Urban Greening in China
YANG Jing-yi,YANG Jun,MA Lv-yi,JIA Zhong-kui. Comparison and Analysis of Evaluation System of Urban Greening in China[J]. Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, 2011, 0(4): 13-16
Authors:YANG Jing-yi  YANG Jun  MA Lv-yi  JIA Zhong-kui
Affiliation:(Laboratory of Forest Silviculture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract:Urban greening can help to improve environments of cities. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of urban greening efforts and guide the planning process, an evaluation system needs to be created. In this study four different evaluation systems at the national level currently used in China were compared. The criteria for designating national garden city, national green model city, national forest city, and national ecological garden city were analyzed for their accessibility, comparability, simplicity and objectivity. Except for meeting the criterion of accessibility, the other three evaluation systems did not meet their criteria in certain degrees. So public opinions should be reflected in the evaluation system. Relative indicators should be added and more quantitative indexes should be used. All indicators should be weighted by using standard mathematical method.
Keywords:urban greening  evaluation indicator  evaluation principle  weight
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号