| 水环境质量评价3种方法的应用对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王娟,高原.水环境质量评价3种方法的应用对比[J].工业安全与环保,2007,33(2):16-17,64. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王娟 高原 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南交通大学环境科学与工程学院,成都,610031 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从众多水质评价方法中选取单项指数法、加权均值型指数法、模糊数学法进行介绍,并通过运用这3种方法对大汶河某年监测数据的平均值进行评价.经对比分析发现,加权均值型指数法是一种比较实用的水质评价方法,模糊数学法可以作为必要的补充.
|
| 关 键 词： | 水质评价 单项指数法 加权均值型指数法 模糊数学法 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-08-22 |
Application and Comparison on Three Methods of Quality Assessment on Water Environment |
| |
| WANG Juan,GAO Yuan.Application and Comparison on Three Methods of Quality Assessment on Water Environment[J].Industrial Safety and Dust Control,2007,33(2):16-17,64. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Juan GAO Yuan |
| |
| Institution: | School of Environment Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University Chengdu 610031 |
| |
| Abstract: | Three kinds of water quality assessment methods are intrnduced, such as worst factor judgment method, coefficient average assessment and fuzzy mathematics and they are used to assess the average value of supervision data in some year of Dawen River. It is founded out that the coefficient average assessment is more practical in the three methods and fuzzy mathematics is a necessary complement. |
| |
| Keywords: | water quality assessment worst factor judgment method coefficient average assessment fuzzy mathematics |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
