Issues Related to Solution Chemistry in Mercury Sampling Impingers |
| |
| Authors: | William P Linak Jeffrey V Ryan Behrooz S Ghorishi Jost OL Wendt |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , North Carolina , USA linak.bill@epa.gov;3. Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , North Carolina , USA;4. ARCADIS Geraghty &5. Miller, Inc. , North Carolina , USA;6. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering , University of Arizona , Tucson , USA |
| |
| Abstract: | ABSTRACT Analysis of Hg speciation in combustion flue gases is often accomplished in standardized sampling trains in which the sample is passed sequentially through a series of aqueous solutions to capture and separate oxidized Hg (Hg2+) and elemental Hg (Hg0). Such methods include the Ontario Hydro (OH) and the Alkaline Mercury Speciation (AMS) methods, which were investigated in the laboratory to determine whether the presence of Cl2 and other common flue gas species can bias the partitioning of Hg0 to front impingers intended to isolate Hg2+ species. Using only a single impinger to represent the front three impingers for each method, it was found that as little as 1-ppm Cl2 in a simulated flue gas mixture led to a bias of approximately 10-20% of Hg0 misreported as Hg2+ for both the OH and the AMS methods. Experiments using 100-ppm Cl2 led to a similar bias in the OH method, but to a 30-60% bias in the AMS method. These false readings are shown to be due to liquid-phase chemistry in the impinger solutions, and not necessarily to the gas-phase reactions between Cl2 and Hg as previously proposed. The pertinent solution chemistry causing the interference |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
