首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Uncertainty-based quantitative assessment of sustainability for higher education institutions
Authors:Bushra Waheed  Faisal I Khan  Brian Veitch  Kelly Hawboldt
Institution:1. Universidad de Salamanca, Spain;2. Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Spain;3. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Spain;1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia;2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia;1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China;2. Research Center of Green Building and New Energy, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China;3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
Abstract:Evaluation of sustainability in various facets of life is gaining increasing importance. Traditionally, different multi-criteria decision-making methods have been used for sustainability assessment. “Sustainability” can be a qualitative concept, and as such several researchers have attempted fuzzy logic for the quantitative assessment of sustainability. This paper outlines a new evaluation model based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making. The model is tested for sustainability assessment of higher education institutions (HEIs). It is based on a driving force–pressure–state–exposure–effect–action (DPSEEA) framework and is called uncertainty-based DPSEEA-Sustainability index Model (uD-SiM). The uD-SiM is a causality-based model in which the sustainability index is an outcome of nonlinear impacts of sustainability indicators in different stages of DPSEEA. The percent contribution of driving forces on the sustainability index of HEI is investigated using sensitivity analysis. The study reveals that education in sustainability and global and local research trends are the major driving forces for achieving sustainability in HEI, followed by financial and economic growth rate, social equity, energy requirements rate, and institutional enhancement, in descending order. The results of uD-SiM were found to be more realistic and rational than our earlier proposed approach, D-SiM.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号