首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Multi-pollutant concentration measurements around a concentrated swine production facility using open-path FTIR spectrometry
Institution:1. ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., P.O. Box 12313, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA;2. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA;3. ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller, P.O. Box 13109, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA;4. SpectraSoft Technology, P.O. Box 1596, Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA;1. Department of Forestry & Natural Resources and Bindley Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA;2. Department of Veterinary Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt;3. City of Elkhart, Public Works and Utilities Department, Elkhart, Indiana 46516, USA;4. Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA;5. Jenkinson Environmental, LLC, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA;1. Arizona State University, 660 S. College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005, USA;2. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, AZ 85007, USA
Abstract:Open-path Fourier transform infrared (OP/FTIR) spectrometry was used to measure the concentrations of ammonia, methane, and other atmospheric gases around an integrated industrial swine production facility in eastern North Carolina. Several single-path measurements were made over an 8-day period from 11 to 22 January 1999. Nine different monitoring paths were configured to determine the concentration ranges of ammonia and methane throughout this facility, with an emphasis on isolating the emissions from the farrowing/nursery barns, the finishing barns, and the waste lagoon. A series of sequential measurements was made on 13 January 1999, to estimate the target gas concentrations downwind from each of these sources and at an upwind background site under similar meteorological conditions. The path-averaged concentration (mean±standard deviation) of ammonia during these measurements was below the estimated method detection limit of 0.003 ppm at the background site, 0.328±0.044 ppm between the farrowing/nursery and finishing barns, 2.063±0.140 ppm perpendicular to the airflow from the exhaust fans of the finishing barns, 0.488±0.110 ppm along the western berm of the lagoon, and 0.722±0.659 ppm along the eastern berm of the lagoon. The mean-path-averaged concentration of methane during this same time period was 1.89±0.03 ppm at the background site, 2.58±0.11 ppm between the farrowing/nursery and finishing barns, 2.70±0.05 ppm perpendicular to the airflow from the exhaust fans of the finishing barns, 2.27±0.06 ppm along the western berm of the lagoon, and 11.02±9.69 ppm along the eastern berm of the lagoon as the prevailing westerly winds died down. The concentration measurements made along different monitoring paths during this study indicate that the confinement barns can be a significant source of ammonia, while the lagoon is a major source of methane. Attempts to apply tracer-based dispersion modeling techniques to the single-path OP/FTIR data to estimate emission rates of ammonia and methane from the different sources present at this facility were met with limited success.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号