|
|||||
|
|
| 两种主要泥石流排导槽的比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 陈晓清,士革,李德基,崔鹏. 两种主要泥石流排导槽的比较[J]. 灾害学, 2001, 16(3): 12-16 |
| 作者姓名： | 陈晓清 士革 李德基 崔鹏 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 西南交通大学土木学院;中科院成都山地灾害与环境研究所 2. 中科院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, |
| 基金项目： | 中国科学院"九五”重大项目B"中国山区城镇泥石流综合防治技术研究”(KZ951-B2)部分成果 |
| 摘 要： | 通过大量的实例工程的考察，对两种主要泥石流排导槽－东川槽和V型槽的设计，投资及运行现状进行比较，分析总强出排种导槽各自的优缺点，以供以后设计时参考，优化设计，更有效防治泥石流，节约投资，保护生命财产安全。 |
| 关 键 词： | 泥石流 排导槽 优化设计 东川槽 V型槽 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-811(2001)03-0012-05 |
A Comparison of Two Main Types of Debris Flow Drainage Grooves |
|
| CHEN Xiao qing ,,WANG Shi ge ,LI De ji ,CUI Peng. A Comparison of Two Main Types of Debris Flow Drainage Grooves[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2001, 16(3): 12-16 | |
| Authors: | CHEN Xiao qing WANG Shi ge LI De ji CUI Peng |
| Affiliation: | CHEN Xiao qing 1,2,WANG Shi ge 1,LI De ji 1,CUI Peng 1 |
| Abstract: | By investigating a number of debris flow control works, compare design principles, investment and application status of the two main types of debris flow drainage grooves, namely ladder shaped groove and V shaped groove are compared Their advantages and disadvantages are also summarized and analyzed These experiences are of referential values for optimizing design, effective control of debris flow di sasters and protection of people's life and property |
| Keywords: | debris flow drainage groove design optimization |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |