Cross-shelf variation in calanoid copepod production during summer 1996 off the Oregon coast, USA

The fecundity of nine species of adult female calanoid copepods, and molting rates for copepodite stages of Calanus marshallae were measured in 24 h shipboard incubations from samples taken during the upwelling season off the Oregon coast. Hydrographic and chlorophyll measurements were made at approximately 300 stations, and living zooplankton were collected at 36 stations on the continental shelf (<150 m depth) and 37 stations offshore of the shelf (>150 m depth) for experimental work. In our experiments, maximum egg production rates (EPR) were observed only for Calanus pacificus and Pseudocalanus mimus, 65.7 and 3.9 eggs fem^-1 day^-1 respectively, about 95% of the maximum rates known from published laboratory observations. EPR of all other copepod species (e.g., C. marshallae, Acartia longiremis and Eucalanus californicus) ranged from 3% to 65% of maximum published rates. Fecundity was not significantly related to body weight or temperature, but was significantly correlated with chlorophyll a concentration for all species except Paracalanus parvus and A. longiremis. Copepod biomass and production in on-shelf waters was dominated by female P. mimus and C. marshallae, accounting for 93% of the adult biomass (3.1 mg C m^-3) and 81% of the adult production (0.19 mg C m^-3 day^-1). Biomass in the off-shelf environment was dominated by female E. californicus, P. mimus, and C. pacificus, accounting for 95% of the adult biomass (2.2 mg C m^-3) and 95% of the adult production (0.08 mg C m^-3 day^-1). Copepodite (C1-C5) production was estimated to be 2.1 mg C m^-3 day^-1 (on-shelf waters) and 1.2 mg C m^-3 day^-1 (off-shelf water). Total adult + juvenile production averaged 2.3 mg C m^-3 day^-1 (on-shelf waters) and 1.3 mg C m^-3 day^-1 (off-shelf waters). We compared our measured female weight-specific growth rates to those predicted from the empirical models of copepod growth rates of Huntley and Lopez Am Nat (1992) 140:201-242] and Hirst and Lampitt Mar Biol (1998) 132:247-257]. Most of our measured values were lower than those predicted from the equation of Huntley and Lopez. We found good agreement with Hirst and Lampitt for growth rates <0.10 day^-1 but found that their empirical equations underestimated growth at rates >0.10 day^-1. The mismatch with Hirst and Lampitt resulted because some of our species were growing at maximum rates whereas their composite empirical equations predict "global" averages that do not represent maximum growth rates.