从摩尔的理论看环境伦理学的自然价值观

摩尔在伦理学原理一书中，首次分析了传统伦理学关于善的那种性质。指出善并不是一种自然之属性。而是一种非自然的属性。在严格的意义上说，善是不可定义的。并认为传统伦理学是犯了一种自然主义的谬误。摩尔的理论也波及到环境伦理学，特别是罗尔斯顿的自然价值理论受到了挑战。罗尔斯顿对自然主义的批评作出了回应。他把伦理义务的条件置于科学规律之前，并站在自然主义的立场上，指出自然界的生态平衡才是一切价值的基础。

The Evaluation from Moore's Theory on Natural Values of Environmental Ethics

Moore in a book Principia of Ethics, the first analysis the good character of traditional ethics . Pointed out that the good is not a natural property, but an unnatural attributes. In the strict sense, the good is not defined. And that the traditional ethics is guilty of a naturalistic fallacy. Moore＇s theory also extends to environmental ethics, especially in Ralston＇s natural value theory has been challenged. Ralston responded the criticism of the naturalistic. he placed Ethical obligations to the conditions before the scientific laws, and he stood nahuralistic position, pointing out that the ecological balance of nature is the basis of all values.