Advisory Committee: A Powerful Tool for Helping Decision Makers in Environmental Issues |
| |
Authors: | Liette Vasseur Lise Lafrance Colette Ansseau Dominique Renaud Daniel Morin Thérèse Audet |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Département de Biologie Faculté des Sciences Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada , CA;(2) Département de Psychologie Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada , CA |
| |
Abstract: | / It has been suggested that the general public should be moreinvolved in environmental policy and decision making. It is important forthem to realize that they will have to live with the consequences ofenvironmental policies and decisions. Consequently, policy makers shouldconsider the concerns and opinions of the general public before makingdecisions on environmental issues. This raises questions such as: How can weintegrate the perceptions and reactions of the general population inenvironmental decisions? What kind of public participation should weconsider? In the present study, using a new regional ecosystem model, weattempted to integrate these aspects in its decision making model byincluding the formation of an advisory committee to resolve problems relatedto waste management. The advisory committee requested the activeparticipation of representatives from all levels of the community: economic,municipal, and governmental intervenors; environmental groups; and citizens.Their mandates were to examine different management strategies available inthe region, considering all the interdisciplinary aspects of each strategy,elaborate recommendations concerning the management strategies that are mostsuitable for all, and collaborate in communication of the information to thegeneral population. The results showed that at least in small municipalitiessuch an advisory committee can be a powerful tool in environmental decisionmaking. Conditions required for a successful consultation process, such aseveryday lay language and the presence of a facilitator other than ascientific expert, are discussed.KEY WORDS: Public consultation; Environmental policies;Interdisciplinary aspects; Municipal sewage sludge management; Generalpopulation; Decision-making process |
| |
Keywords: | : Public consultation Environmental policies Interdisciplinary aspects Municipal sewage sludge management General population Decision-making process |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|