Difficulties in applying extended producer responsibility policies in developing countries: case studies in e-waste recycling in China and Thailand |
| |
Authors: | Michikazu Kojima Aya Yoshida So Sasaki |
| |
Institution: | 1. Environment and Natural Resource Studies Group, Interdisciplinary Studies Center, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO), 3-2-2 Wakaba, Mihama-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 261-8545, Japan 2. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan 3. Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
|
| |
Abstract: | Developing Asian countries have started to apply the principle of extended producer responsibility (EPR) to electronics and
electrical equipment waste (e-waste). This policy approach aims to give electronic appliance manufacturers and importers responsibility
for the collection and recycling of discarded electronic equipment. China and Thailand have drafted regulations on the recycling
of e-waste with common characteristics such as the financial responsibility of producers and subsidies for collection. Although
the proposed system is sensible, taking into account the fact that e-waste is a market-traded commodity, there are two major
difficulties in implementing EPR in developing countries. First, it may be difficult for governments to collect funds from
producers or importers if smuggled, imitation, or small shop-assembled products have a large share in the market. Second,
the system creates incentives for collectors and recyclers to over-report the amount of collected e-waste in order to gain
extra subsidies from the fund. Other policy measures such as the enforcement of pollution control regulations on informal
recyclers, the prevention of smuggling, and the protection of intellectual property rights should accompany EPR policies. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|