首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

饮用水水源保护区河流水环境容量计算模型
引用本文:陈丁江,吕军,金树权,沈晔娜,史一鸣.饮用水水源保护区河流水环境容量计算模型[J].环境科学,2008,29(9):2437-2440.
作者姓名:陈丁江  吕军  金树权  沈晔娜  史一鸣
作者单位:1. 浙江大学环境与资源学院资源科学系,杭州,310029
2. 浙江大学环境与资源学院资源科学系,杭州,310029;浙江大学污染环境修复与生态健康教育部重点实验室,杭州,310029
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划),国家自然科学基金,江苏省科技厅科研项目
摘    要:基于河流一维水环境容量计算模型,通过水质控制目标分析,引入了饮用水供水水库的水环境容量决定其保护区内河流水质控制目标的概念,提出以水库的水环境容量为其上游保护区内河流段末的水质控制目标,解决了由于河流与湖库的总磷水质标准不一致、水质标准中没有河流总氮指标以及水环境容量计算中河流与湖库水文设计条件不同步等,导致水源保护区内河流的水质控制目标确定困难的问题,建立了针对饮用水水源保护区内河流水环境容量的计算模型和方法,本模型直接表达了饮用水供水水库与其上游河流水环境容量之间的定最关系,体现了2个水域间的连续性和相互作用关系,为实现饮用水供水水库及其上游河流的污染物总量控制提供了可靠的科学依据,应用本模型,计算了正在建设中的老虎潭水库保护区内河流的水环境容量.结果表明,根据老虎潭水库水环境存量,保护区内河流的总氮水环境容量为65.05 t·a-1,现状总氮年入河量应削减33.86 t;总磷水环境容量为5.05 t·a-1,现状条件下尚有2.23 t·a-的剩余水环境容量,文中所提出的建模方法可以推广至水质控制目标不同情况下的连续水域,尤其适用于下游水域水质控制要求高于上游水域的情况,拓展了水环境容量的研究思路和方法.

关 键 词:饮用水水源  保护区  河流  水环境容量  非点源污染    
收稿时间:9/3/2007 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2007/10/16 0:00:00

Water Environmental Capacity Calculation Model for the Rivers in Drinking Water Source Conservation Area
CHEN Ding-jiang,L Jan,SHEN Ye-na,JIN Shu-quan,SHI Yi-ming.Water Environmental Capacity Calculation Model for the Rivers in Drinking Water Source Conservation Area[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2008,29(9):2437-2440.
Authors:CHEN Ding-jiang  L Jan  SHEN Ye-na  JIN Shu-quan  SHI Yi-ming
Institution:CHEN Ding-jiang,L(U) Jan,SHEN Ye-na,JIN Shu-quan,SHI Yi-ming
Abstract:Based on the one-dimension model for water environmental capacity (WEC) in river, a new model for the WEC estimation in river-reservoir system was developed in drinking water source conservation area (DWSCA). In the new model, the concept was introduced that the water quality target of the rivers in DWSCA was determined by the water quality demand of reservoir for drinking water source. It implied that the WEC of the reservoir could be used as the water quality control target at the reach-end of the upstream rivers in DWSCA so that the problems for WEC estimation might be avoided that the differences of the standards for a water quality control target between in river and in reservoir, such as the criterions differences for total phosphorus (TP)/total nitrogen (TN) between in reservoir and in river according to the National Surface Water Quality Standard of China (GB 3838-2002), and the difference of designed hydrology conditions for WEC estimation between in reservoir and in river. The new model described the quantitative relationship between the WEC of drinking water source and of the river, and it factually expressed the continuity and interplay of these low water areas. As a case study, WEC for the rivers in DWSCA of Laohutan reservoir located in southeast China was estimated using the new model. Results indicated that the WEC for TN and TP was 65.05 t·a-1 and 5.05 t·a-1 in the rivers of the DWSCA, respectively. According to the WEC of Laohutan reservoir and current TN and TP quantity that entered into the rivers, about 33.86 t·a-1 of current TN quantity should be reduced in the DWSCA, while there was 2.23 t·a-1 of residual WEC of TP in the rivers. The modeling method was also widely applicable for the continuous water bodies with different water quality targets, especially for the situation of higher water quality control target in downstream water body than that in upstream.
Keywords:conservation area  river  water environmental capacity  nonpoint source pollution  nitrogen  phosphorus
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号