首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Reallocating budgets among ongoing and emerging conservation projects
Authors:Chung-Huey Wu  Aaron J Dodd  Cindy E Hauser  Michael A McCarthy
Institution:1. School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010 Australia;2. School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010 Australia

Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010 Australia

Abstract:Conserving biodiversity and combating ecological hazards require cost-effective allocation of limited resources among potential management projects. Project priorities, however, can change over time as underlying social-ecological systems progress, novel priorities emerge, and management capabilities evolve. Thus, reallocation of ongoing investments in response to shifting priorities could improve management outcomes and address urgent demands, especially when additional funding is not available immediately. Resource reallocation, however, could incur transaction costs, require additional monitoring and reassessment, and be constrained by ongoing project commitments. Such complexities may prevent managers from considering potentially beneficial reallocation strategies, reducing long-term effectiveness. We propose an iterative project prioritization approach, based on marginal return-on-investment estimation and portfolio optimization, that guides resource reallocation among ongoing and new projects. Using simulation experiments in 2 case studies, we explored how this approach can improve efficacy under varying reallocation constraints, frequencies, costs, and rates of project portfolio change. Periodic budget reallocation could enhance the management of stochastically emerging invasive weeds in Australia and thus reduce the overall risk by up to 50% compared with a static budget. Reallocation frequency and the rate of new weed incursion synergistically increased the conservation gains achieved by allowing unconstrained reallocation. Conversely, budget reallocation would not improve the International Union for Conservation of Nature conservation status of threatened Australian birds due to slow rates of transition among conservation states; extinction risk could increase if portfolio reassessment is costly. Although other project prioritization studies may recommend periodic reassessment and reallocation, our findings revealed conditions when reallocation is valuable and demonstrated a structured approach that can help conservation agencies schedule and implement iterative budget-allocation decisions cost-effectively.
Keywords:dynamic resource allocation  invasive species  optimization  prioritization  project portfolio  return on investment  threatened birds  asignación dinámica de recursos  aves amenazadas  especies invasoras  optimización  portafolio de proyecto  priorización  rentabilidad
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号