首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Dynamics in the global protected-area estate since 2004
Authors:Edward Lewis  Brian MacSharry  Diego Juffe-Bignoli  Nyeema Harris  Georgina Burrows  Naomi Kingston  Neil D Burgess
Institution:1. UN Environment – World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL U.K.;2. Luc Hoffmann Institute, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland;3. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN U.K.;4. UN Environment – World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL U.K.

Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Building 3, 2nd Floor, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2100 Denmark

Abstract:Nations of the world have committed to a number of goals and targets to address global environmental challenges. Protected areas have for centuries been a key strategy in conservation and play a major role in addressing current challenges. The most important tool used to track progress on protected-area commitments is the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Periodic assessments of the world's protected-area estate show steady growth over the last 2 decades. However, the current method, which uses the latest version of the WDPA, does not show the true dynamic nature of protected areas over time and does not provide information on sites removed from the WDPA. In reality, this method can only show growth or remain stable. We used GIS tools in an approach to assess protected-area change over time based on 12 temporally distinct versions of the WDPA that quantify area added and removed from the WDPA annually from 2004 to 2016. Both the narrative of continual growth of protected area and the counter-narrative of protected area removal were overly simplistic. The former because growth was almost entirely in the marine realm and the latter because some areas removed were reprotected in later years. On average 2.5 million km2 was added to the WDPA annually and 1.1 million km2 was removed. Reasons for the inclusion and removal of protected areas in the WDPA database were in part due to data-quality issues but also to on-the-ground changes. To meet the 17% protected-area component of Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 by 2020, which stood at 14.7% in 2016, either the rate of protected-area removal must decrease or the rate of protected-area designation and addition to the WDPA must increase.
Keywords:Aichi target 11  coverage  protected area  protected area downgrading downsizing degazettement  World Database on Protected Areas  área protegida  Base de Datos Mundial de las Áreas Protegidas  cobertura  degradación reducción y pérdida de protección legal de las áreas protegidas  objetico 11 de Aichi  保护区  世界保护区数据库 (World Database on Protected Areas)  覆盖  保护区降级、缩小、撤除  爱知目标11
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号