首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Bridging Disciplines, Knowledge Systems and Cultures in Pest Management
Authors:Will Allen  Shaun Ogilvie  Helen Blackie  Des Smith  Shona Sam  James Doherty  Don McKenzie  James Ataria  Lee Shapiro  Jamie MacKay  Elaine Murphy  Chris Jacobson  Charles Eason
Institution:1. Learning for Sustainability, Christchurch, New Zealand
2. Eco Research Associates Ltd, 44 Cleveland Street, St Albans, Christchurch, New Zealand
3. Centre for Wildlife Management and Conservation, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, 7647, Lincoln, New Zealand
4. Tuhoe Tuawhenua Trust, PO Box 83, Murupara, New Zealand
5. Northland Regional Council, Private Bag 9021, Whangarei, New Zealand
6. Te Mātāpuna, Kaupapa Māori Unit, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, 7647, Lincoln, New Zealand
7. Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand
8. Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, DC, Locked Bag 4, Sunshine Coast, QLD, 4558, Australia
9. Cawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, Nelson, New Zealand
Abstract:The success of research in integrated environmental and natural resource management relies on the participation and involvement of different disciplines and stakeholders. This can be difficult to achieve in practice because many initiatives fail to address the underlying social processes required for successful engagement and social learning. We used an action research approach to support a research-based group with a range of disciplinary and stakeholder expertise to critically reflect on their engagement practice and identify lessons around how to collaborate more effectively. This approach is provided here as a guide that can be used to support reflective research practice for engagement in other integration-based initiatives. This paper is set in the context of an integrated wildlife management research case study in New Zealand. We illustrate how multi-, inter- and trans-disciplinary approaches can provide a framework for considering the different conversations that need to occur in an integrated research program. We then outline rubrics that list the criteria required in inter- and trans-disciplinary collaborations, along with examples of effective engagement processes that directly support integration through such efforts. Finally, we discuss the implications of these experiences for other researchers and managers seeking to improve engagement and collaboration in integrated science, management and policy initiatives. Our experiences reaffirm the need for those involved in integrative initiatives to attend to the processes of engagement in both formal and informal settings, to provide opportunities for critical reflective practice, and to look for measures of success that acknowledge the importance of effective social process.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号