首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


CO2 storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps
Authors:Stefan Bachu  Didier Bonijoly  John Bradshaw  Robert Burruss  Sam Holloway  Niels Peter Christensen  Odd Magne Mathiassen
Institution:1. Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, 4999-98th Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6B 2X3;2. BRGM-CDG/DIR 3, Avenue Claude Guillemin, BP 6009 45060 Orleans cedex 2, France;3. Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;4. US Geological Survey, National Center MS 956, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, USA;5. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK;6. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Vester Voldgade 10, DK-1250, Copenhagen K, Denmark;7. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, P.O. Box 600, N-4003 Stavanger, Norway;1. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, United States;2. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 3610 Collins Ferry Road, Morgantown, WV 26507, United States;3. Illinois State Geological Survey, 615 E. Peabody, Champaign, IL 61820, United States;4. Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, 15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018, Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018, United States;1. Department of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Malaysia;2. Department of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Australia;3. Department of Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, Malaysia;4. Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Malaysia;1. Total, avenue Larribau, Pau, 64018, France;2. Alberta Innovates Technology Futures, 250 Karl Clark Road NW, Edmonton, AB, T6N 1E4, Canada;3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA;4. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG,United Kingdom;5. TNO, Utrecht, Netherland
Abstract:Implementation of CO2 capture and geological storage (CCGS) technology at the scale needed to achieve a significant and meaningful reduction in CO2 emissions requires knowledge of the available CO2 storage capacity. CO2 storage capacity assessments may be conducted at various scales—in decreasing order of size and increasing order of resolution: country, basin, regional, local and site-specific. Estimation of the CO2 storage capacity in depleted oil and gas reservoirs is straightforward and is based on recoverable reserves, reservoir properties and in situ CO2 characteristics. In the case of CO2-EOR, the CO2 storage capacity can be roughly evaluated on the basis of worldwide field experience or more accurately through numerical simulations. Determination of the theoretical CO2 storage capacity in coal beds is based on coal thickness and CO2 adsorption isotherms, and recovery and completion factors. Evaluation of the CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers is very complex because four trapping mechanisms that act at different rates are involved and, at times, all mechanisms may be operating simultaneously. The level of detail and resolution required in the data make reliable and accurate estimation of CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers practical only at the local and site-specific scales. This paper follows a previous one on issues and development of standards for CO2 storage capacity estimation, and provides a clear set of definitions and methodologies for the assessment of CO2 storage capacity in geological media. Notwithstanding the defined methodologies suggested for estimating CO2 storage capacity, major challenges lie ahead because of lack of data, particularly for coal beds and deep saline aquifers, lack of knowledge about the coefficients that reduce storage capacity from theoretical to effective and to practical, and lack of knowledge about the interplay between various trapping mechanisms at work in deep saline aquifers.
Keywords:CO2 geological storage  Capacity estimation  Oil and gas reservoirs  Coal beds  Deep saline aquifers
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号