Monitoring and assessment of surface water acidification following rewetting of oxidised acid sulfate soils |
| |
Authors: | Luke M Mosley Benjamin Zammit Ann-Marie Jolley Liz Barnett Rob Fitzpatrick |
| |
Institution: | 1. Water Quality Branch, Environment Protection Authority (South Australia), GPO Box 2607, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia 3. Acid Sulfate Soils Research Centre, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 2. Department for Environment Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide, Australia 4. CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia
|
| |
Abstract: | Large-scale exposure of acid sulfate soils during a hydrological drought in the Lower Lakes of South Australia resulted in acidification of surface water in several locations. Our aim was to describe the techniques used to monitor, assess and manage these acidification events using a field and laboratory dataset (n?=?1,208) of acidic to circum-neutral pH water samples. The median pH of the acidified (pH?<?6.5) samples was 3.8. Significant (p?<?0.05) increases in soluble metals (Al, Co, Mn, Ni and Zn above guidelines for ecosystem protection), SO4 (from pyrite oxidation), Si (from aluminosilicate dissolution) and Ca (from carbonate dissolution and limestone addition), were observed under the acidic conditions. The log of the soluble metal concentrations, acidity and SO4/Cl ratio increased linearly with pH. The pH, alkalinity and acidity measurements were used to inform aerial limestone dosing events to neutralise acidic water. Field measurements correlated strongly with laboratory measurements for pH, alkalinity and conductivity (r 2?≥?0.97) but only moderately with acidity (r 2?=?0.54), which could be due to difficulties in determining the indicator-based field titration endpoint. Laboratory measured acidity correlated well with calculated acidity (r 2?=?0.87, acidity present as AlIII?>>?H+?≈?MnII?>?FeII/III) but was about 20 % higher on average. Geochemical speciation calculations and XRD measurements indicated that solid phase minerals (schwertmannite and jarosite for Fe and jurbanite for Al) were likely controlling dissolved metal concentrations and influencing measured acidity between pH 2 and 5. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|