Effects of Riparian Vegetation and Watershed Urbanization on Fishes in Streams of the Mid‐Atlantic Piedmont (USA)1 |
| |
Authors: | Richard J. Horwitz Thomas E. Johnson Paul F. Overbeck T. Kevin O’Donnell W. Cully Hession Bernard W. Sweeney |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Respectively (Horwitz, Johnson, Overbeck, O’Donnell, Hession), Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 [Johnson now at U.S. EPA ORD/NCEA, Mail Code 8601‐P, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460;2. O’Donnell now at Department of Soil, Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Missouri‐Columbia, 302 ABNR Building, Columbia, Missouri 65211;3. Hession now at Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061];4. and (Sweeney) Stroud Water Research Center, 970 Spencer Road, Avondale, Pennsylvania 19311. |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract: The joint influences of riparian vegetation and urbanization on fish assemblages were analyzed by depletion sampling in paired forested and nonforested reaches of 25 small streams along an urbanization gradient. Nonforested reaches were narrower than their forested counterparts, so densities based on surface area differ from linear densities (based on reach length). Linear densities (based on number or biomass of fish) of American eel, white sucker and tesselated darter, and the proportion of biomass of benthic invertivores were significantly higher in nonforested reaches, while linear densities of margined madtom and the number of pool species were significantly higher in forested reaches. Observed riparian effects may reflect differences in habitat and algal productivity between forested and nonforested reaches. These results suggest that relatively small‐scale riparian restoration projects can affect local geomorphology and the abundance of fish. Dense vegetative cover in riparian zones and similar or analogous habitats in both forested and nonforested reaches, the relatively small scale of the nonforested reaches, and the low statistical power to detect differences in abundance of rare species may have limited the observed differences between forested and nonforested reaches. There was a strong urbanization gradient, with reductions of intolerant species and increases of tolerant species and omnivores with increasing urbanization. Interactions between riparian vegetation type and urbanization were found for blacknose dace, creek chub, tesselated darter, and the proportion of biomass of lithophilic spawners. The study did not provide consistent support for the hypotheses that responses of fish to riparian vegetation would be overwhelmed by urban degradation or insignificant at low urbanization. |
| |
Keywords: | fish riparian ecology watershed management stream restoration urbanization rivers/streams land use/land cover change biotic integrity Pennsylvania |
|
|