首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Focus on mission success: Process safety for the Atychiphobist
Authors:William R Nelson  Karl Van Scyoc
Institution:1. Amsterdam School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada;1. Cass Business School, City University, London EC1Y 8TZ, United Kingdom;2. China Institute for Actuarial Science, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081, China;1. NIMMA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil;2. Biomechanics Engineering Laboratory, University Hospital (HU), Federal University of Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil;3. Grupo de Desenvolvimento em Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, 88504-900, Tubarão, SC, Brazil;1. College of Business Administration, Hunan University, 410082, Changsha, PR China;2. College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Hunan Normal University, 410081, Changsha, PR China;1. Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza, Università della Calabria, Ponte Bucci cubo 3C, Rende (CS), 87030, Italy;2. ING Bank, Bijlmerdreef 98, 1102 CT Amsterdam NL, ALP B 03.082, Netherlands;3. Business School, University of Kent, Park Wood Road, Canterbury, CT2 7PE, UK;1. Cass Business School, City University, London EC1Y 8TZ, United Kingdom;2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada;3. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Abstract:Modern process plants are complex engineering systems. While thorough reviews of system safeguards are performed, catastrophic events continue to occur, often unfolding in unforeseen ways. Success in process safety demands safe processes, and understanding rare, high consequence events is central to the traditional process safety approach. This philosophy is common to all high-hazard industries, offering the potential for sharing approaches, experience, and lessons learned. The problem, however, is that people (and organizations and entire industries) who fear failure (atychiphobia) sometimes obsess about failure so much that they miss opportunities to succeed.This paper examines selected risk management practices in the power generation and aerospace industries and how those practices have led to improved performance. Risk informed decision making (RIDM) has had widespread application in the nuclear and aerospace industries, and is undergoing enhancements to become a key framework for risk management. Additionally, rather than focusing on avoidance of loss, there are emerging approaches supporting achievement of success. This approach provides a more direct link of risk to business and operational objectives, but does challenge conventional risk approaches founded in a loss prevention-centric view. The paper reflects upon risk informed decision making and success modeling, and suggests how these methods may be applied in the field of process safety. Specific examples are drawn from the defense in depth approach from the nuclear power industry and mission success concepts developed for NASA.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号