Variance and Uncertainty in the Expected Number of Occurrences in Reserve Selection |
| |
Authors: | ATTE MOILANEN&dagger , MAR CABEZA&dagger |
| |
Affiliation: | Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Abstract: Reserve selection often concerns the design of reserve networks for the long-term maintenance of biodiversity. We considered uncertainty in the context of three common reserve-selection formulations, the expected number of populations, proportional coverage of land-cover types, and the probability of having at least one population. By uncertainty, we mean variance in the outcome of any probability-based reserve selection formulation. A typical reserve-selection formulation might ask for the least expensive set of sites that contains n populations per species. It is implicit here that this requirement concerns the expected number of populations, which actually is obtained only with a 50% chance. If the requirement is changed to select the least expensive set of sites that gives n populations per species with a 95% probability, the number of sites required in the solution increases and the identity of the sites is changed toward sites that have high probabilities of persistence (or occurrence) and low associated binomial variance. Anthropogenic threat is one factor that may cause probabilistic uncertainty in the context of proportional area coverage. |
| |
Keywords: | complementarity maximum expected coverage persistence site-selection algorithm threat uncertainty |
|
|