首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Case studies in co-benefits approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation
Authors:Benjamin Spencer  Josh Lawler  Celia Lowe  LuAnne Thompson  Tom Hinckley  Soo-Hyung Kim
Institution:1. Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;2. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;3. School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;4. Department of Anthropology and Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;5. School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;6. School of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Abstract:Attempts to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions or manage the effects of climate change traditionally focus on management or policy options that promote single outcomes (e.g., either benefiting ecosystems or human health and well-being). In contrast, co-benefits approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation address climate change impacts on human and ecological health in tandem and on a variety of spatial and temporal scales. The article engages the concept of co-benefits through four case studies. The case studies emphasize co-benefits approaches that are accessible and tractable in countries with human populations that are particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts. They illustrate the potential of co-benefits approaches and provide a platform for further discussion of several interdependent principles relevant to the implementation of co-benefits strategies. These principles include providing incentives across multiple scales and time frames, promoting long-term integrated impact assessment, and fostering multidimensional communication networks.
Keywords:human health  ecological health  incentives  impact assessment  multidimensional networks
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号