首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: A critical review
Authors:Ni Ji-Qin  Robarge Wayne P  Xiao Changhe  Heber Albert J
Institution:a Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
b Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Abstract:Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are regulated aerial pollutants that have environmental and health concerns. Swine operations produce and emit a complex mixture of VOCs with a wide range of molecular weights and a variety of physicochemical properties. Significant progress has been made in this area since the first experiment on VOCs at a swine facility in the early 1960s. A total of 47 research institutions in 15 North American, European, and Asian countries contributed to an increasing number of scientific publications. Nearly half of the research papers were published by U.S. institutions.Investigated major VOC sources included air inside swine barns, in headspaces of manure storages and composts, in open atmosphere above swine wastewater, and surrounding swine farms. They also included liquid swine manure and wastewater, and dusts inside and outside swine barns. Most of the sample analyses have been focusing on identification of VOC compounds and their relationship with odors. More than 500 VOCs have been identified. About 60% and 10% of the studies contributed to the quantification of VOC concentrations and emissions, respectively. The largest numbers of VOC compounds with reported concentrations in a single experimental study were 82 in air, 36 in manure, and 34 in dust samples.The relatively abundant VOC compounds that were quantified in at least two independent studies included acetic acid, butanoic acid (butyric acid), dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl sulfide, iso-valeric, p-cresol, propionic acid, skatole, trimethyl amine, and valeric acid in air. They included acetic acid, p-cresol, iso-butyric acid, butyric acid, indole, phenol, propionic acid, iso-valeric acid, and skatole in manure. In dust samples, they were acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, p-cresol, hexanal, and decanal. Swine facility VOCs were preferentially bound to smaller-size dusts.Identification and quantification of VOCs were restricted by using instruments based on gas Chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) with different detectors most of which require time-consuming procedures to obtain results. Various methodologies and technologies in sampling, sample preparation, and sample analysis have been used. Only four publications reported using GC based analyzers and PTR-MS (proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry) that allowed continuous VOC measurement. Because of this, the majority of experimental studies were only performed on limited numbers of air, manure, or dust samples. Many aerial VOCs had concentrations that were too low to be identified by the GC peaks.Although VOCs emitted from swine facilities have environmental concerns, only a few studies investigated VOC emission rates, which ranged from 3.0 to 176.5 mg d−1 kg−1 pig at swine finishing barns and from 2.3 to 45.2 g d−1 m−2 at manure storages. Similar to the other pollutants, spatial and temporal variations of aerial VOC concentrations and emissions existed and were significantly affected by manure management systems, barn structural designs, and ventilation rates.Scientific research in this area has been mainly driven by odor nuisance, instead of environment or health concerns. Compared with other aerial pollutants in animal agriculture, the current scientific knowledge about VOCs at swine facilities is still very limited and far from sufficient to develop reliable emission factors.
Keywords:APHA  American Public Health Association  ARS  Agricultural Research Service  ASD  amperometric sulfur detector  BOD5  biological oxygen demand over 5-day period  CAA  Clean Air Act  CERCLA  Comprehensive Environmental Response  Compensation and Liability Act  CDFB  complete-data-full-barn  COD  chemical oxygen demand  DFID  dual-flame ionization detector  EPA  Environmental Protection Agency  EPCRA  Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act  FID  flame ionization detection  ECD  electron capture detector  GC  gas chromatography  GLC  gas-liquid chromatography  HCH  hexachlorocyclohexane  HPLC  high performance liquid chromatography  HC  hydrocarbon  HS  headspace solid phase  IEC  ion-exclusion chromatography  ITD  ion trap detector  IUPAC  International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry  LC  liquid chromatography  MDGC  multidimensional gas chromatography  MIMS  membrane inlet mass spectrometry  MS  mass spectrometry  MSD  mass selection detector  NMHC  non-methane hydrocarbon  NRC  National Research Council  NVOC  non-volatile organic compound  O  olfactometry  PAH  polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon  Paper-C  paper chromatography  PCB  polychlorinated biphenyl  PFPD  pulsed flame photometric  PM  particulate matters  PTR-MS  proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry  SVOC  semi-volatile organic compound  SP  spectrophotometer  SPME  solid phase micro-extraction  TD  thermo-conductivity detector  TD-GC  thermal desorption gas chromatography  TLC  thin-layer chromatography  TDU  thermal desorption unity  TOA  total organic acid  VFA  volatile fatty acid  VIC  volatile inorganic compound  VOC  volatile organic compound
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号