首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Physical,chemical and biological behaviour of fumigants on cottonseed
Authors:Yu Xiao  Tao Liu  Chunyuan Gu  Jinghui Yu  Manjree Agarwal
Institution:1. Australia–China Centre for Postharvest Biosecurity and Food Safety, School of Veterinary and Life Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia;2. Institute of Inspection and Quarantine Equipment, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Abstract:Fumigation is required to protect cottonseed in storage and pre-shipment from insect pests and/or microorganisms. Fumigation of cottonseed with carbon disulphide (CS2), carbonyl sulphide (COS), ethanedinitrile (C2N2), ethyl formate (EF), methyl bromide (MB) and phosphine (PH3) showed that >85% of the fumigants disappeared within 5?h of exposure. COS maintained >20?mg L–1 for 24?h. After 1?day of aeration, 75%–85% of the absorbed COS and MB and 20%–40% of the absorbed CS2, EF and PH3 were released from treated cottonseed. The fumigant residues were reduced by 80% for COS, 50% for EF or MB and 25% for CS2 after 1?day of aeration. After 13?days of aeration, fumigant residues were reduced by 95% for MB, 65% for EF, 55% for CS2 and to natural levels in the COS residue. Carbon disulphide, COS, PH3, EF and C2N2 had no effect on the germination of cottonseed, but germination was reduced to 50% by MB. COS has potential as a fumigant for control of insect pests in cottonseed because it dissipates quickly and does not negatively impact germination. On the other hand, MB appears to strongly absorb and requires an extended period for residues to dissipate, and it negatively impacts germination.
Keywords:Cotton seed fumigation  alternative fumigant  fumigant residues  fumigant sorption and desorption
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号