首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

贵州灰家堡金矿田土壤重金属元素环境地球化学评价
引用本文:李磊,赵平,梁凌,张军,何雪莲,陈明,陈发恩,王泽鹏,胡德勇,王大福,黄毅,潘启权,万大学,刘松.贵州灰家堡金矿田土壤重金属元素环境地球化学评价[J].地球与环境,2020,48(6):719-727.
作者姓名:李磊  赵平  梁凌  张军  何雪莲  陈明  陈发恩  王泽鹏  胡德勇  王大福  黄毅  潘启权  万大学  刘松
作者单位:1. 贵州省地质矿产勘查开发局一○五地质大队, 贵阳 550018;2. 贵州省环境工程评估中心, 贵阳 550002;3. 贵州紫金矿业股份有限公司, 贵州 贞丰 562200
基金项目:贵州省环境保护厅环境科技项目(黔环科[2016]2号);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合基础[2019]1424号);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合支撑[2019]2833号);贵州紫金矿业股份有限公司环境背景调查项目(A309-20170712);贵州省地质矿产勘查开发局地质科研项目(黔地矿科合[2017]8号)。
摘    要:为了解灰家堡金矿田土壤重金属元素环境地球化学背景和现状,本文开展了土壤重金属(As、Cd、Cr、Cu、Hg、Ni、Pb、Zn)环境质量评价。结果显示,以《土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准》中风险筛选值为标准,灰家堡金矿田大部分区域土壤As和Cu环境地球化学等级高(三级、四级和五级),其它重金属元素(Cd、Cr、Hg、Ni、Pb、Zn)环境地球化学等级低(一级和二级)。高土壤Cu环境地球化学等级(三级)的区域与已知的构造、地层和深部隐伏Au矿体均无空间关系。土壤中Cu的来源主要受地层背景含量的控制。高土壤As环境地球化学等级(三级、四级和五级)的区域主要沿背斜轴和断裂呈带状分布,并与深部矿体相对应,但与已有矿山生产活动区无空间关系。灰家堡金矿田高As环境地球化学等级的土壤与Au的成矿作用有关。

关 键 词:土壤  重金属  地球化学背景  环境评价  灰家堡
收稿时间:2019/12/11 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/8/7 0:00:00

Environmental Geochemistry Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soil at the Huijiabao Au Mine Field in Guizhou, China
LI Lei,ZHAO Ping,LIANG Ling,ZHANG Jun,HE Xuelian,CHEN Ming,CHEN Faen,WANG Zepeng,HU Deyong,WANG Dafu,HUANG Yi,PAN Qiquan,WAN Daxue,LIU Song.Environmental Geochemistry Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soil at the Huijiabao Au Mine Field in Guizhou, China[J].Earth and Environment,2020,48(6):719-727.
Authors:LI Lei  ZHAO Ping  LIANG Ling  ZHANG Jun  HE Xuelian  CHEN Ming  CHEN Faen  WANG Zepeng  HU Deyong  WANG Dafu  HUANG Yi  PAN Qiquan  WAN Daxue  LIU Song
Institution:1. No. 105 Geological Team, Guizhou Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development, Guiyang 550018, China;2. Guizhou Center of Environmental Engineering Assessment, Guiyang 550002, China;3. Guizhou Zijin Mining Co. Ltd, Zhenfeng 562200, China
Abstract:In this study, soil environmental geochemistry survey and evaluation of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Zn) at the Huijiabao Au mine field, Guizhou province, China, was conducted to understand the geochemical background and contamination status. The results showed that most of the soils are of high As and Cu environmental geochemistry grades (third, fourth, and fifth grade) base on the risk screening values in "agricultural land environmental quality standards of soil pollution risk control". Other heavy metal elements (Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, Zn) showed low soil environmental geochemistry grades (first and secondary grade). The areas with high soil Cu environmental geochemistry grades (third grade) showed no spatial correspondence relationships with strata, faults, and deep concealed Au orebodies. The origin of Cu in soil is mainly from the rocks in the mine field. The areas with high soil As environmental geochemistry grades (third, fourth, and fifth grade) were distributed along the anticlinal axis and related fault zones and displayed high relationships with deep concealed orebodies. In addition, it shows on spatial correspondence relationships with the existing mining areas. High As soil at the Huijiabao gold mine field was a result of the Au mineralization.
Keywords:soil  heavy metal  geochemical background  environmental evaluation  Huijiabao
点击此处可从《地球与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球与环境》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号