Effect of Watershed Subdivision and Filter Width on SWAT Simulation of a Coastal Plain Watershed1 |
| |
Authors: | Jaepil Cho Richard R. Lowrance David D. Bosch Timothy C. Strickland Younggu Her George Vellidis |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Respectively, Research Associate, Research Ecologist, Research Hydraulic Engineer, and Supervisory Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, Georgia 31793;2. Professor, Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia 31793-0748;3. Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0303 |
| |
Abstract: | Cho, Jaepil, Richard R. Lowrance, David D. Bosch, Timothy C. Strickland, Younggu Her, and George Vellidis, 2010. Effect of Watershed Subdivision and Filter Width on SWAT Simulation of a Coastal Plain Watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 46(3):586-602. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00436.x Abstract: The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) does not fully simulate riparian buffers, but has a simple filter function that is responsive to filter strip width (FILTERW). The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate SWAT hydrology and water quality response to changes in watershed subdivision levels and different FILTERW configurations and (2) provide guidance for selecting appropriate watershed subdivision for model runs that include the riparian buffer feature through the FILTERW parameter. Watershed subdivision level is controlled by the critical source area (CSA) which defines the minimum drainage area required to form the origin of a stream. SWAT was calibrated on a 15.7 km2 subdrainage within the Little River Experimental Watershed, Georgia. The calibrated parameter set was applied to 32 watershed configurations consisting of four FILTERW representations for each of eight CSA levels. Streamflow predictions were stable regardless of watershed subdivision and FILTERW configuration. Predicted sediment and nutrient loads from upland areas decreased as CSA increased when spatial variations of riparian buffers are considered. Sediment and nutrient yield at the watershed outlet was responsive to different combinations of CSA and FILTERW depending on selected in-stream processes. CSA ranges which provide stable sediment and nutrient yields at the watershed outlet was suggested for avoiding significant modifications in selected parameter set. |
| |
Keywords: | SWAT riparian buffer nonpoint source pollution nutrients sediment simulation watershed |
|
|