首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The self-defensive attribution hypothesis in the work environment: Co-workers’ perspectives
Institution:1. Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki, Unioninkatu 37, 00014 Helsinki, Finland;2. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland;2. Chair of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Moscow University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia;3. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Federal Medical-and-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
Abstract:The study explored the possible influences of situational, personal and non-relevant perception on causality attributions and responsibility assignment in Ghana’s work environment. Ghanaian industrial workers (co-workers) who were witnesses to industrial accidents (n = 117) assigned causality for the mishap and their responses were compared. Analyses were based on the co-workers’ responses to open-ended questions. Three categories of co-workers were identified and labelled as situationally relevant (n = 34), personally relevant (n = 43) and non-relevant co-workers (n = 40). The results showed that co-workers (witnesses) who had some perception of situational and or personal relevance with the accident victims attributed less responsibility to the accident victims than did their counterparts who had no perception of relevance. This observation, like other motivated attributional distortions, seems to reflect a tendency towards self-protection from the three categories of co-workers. It confirms the self-defensive attribution hypothesis in causal attributions about accidents in the work environment.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号